bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Taylor's Law, Smith's Law, and Diversity Power Laws: A Novel Triple Power Law Methodology for Scaling Diversity and Heterogeneity
Abstract
Taylor's power law (TPL) and Smith's power law (SPL) are two foundational scaling laws describing how variance scales with mean density and plot area, respectively. While TPL captures ecological heterogeneity (variation among interacting organisms), SPL captures environmental heterogeneity (variation in the abiotic template). Diversity scaling, traditionally approached through species-area relationships, has been extended to diversity-area relationships (DAR) using Hill numbers. Here we integrate TPL, SPL, and DPL, including three newly proposed models [diversity-mean, diversity-variance, and diversity-heterogeneity relationships (DHR)], into a unified triple power law methodology for scaling diversity and heterogeneity in microbial ecosystems. Using human gut and vaginal microbiome datasets, we systematically vary two orthogonal factors: scale (unit vs. multi-unit) and accrual (without vs. with sample accrual). Our results show that TPL and SPL are complementary: classic TPL captures cross-sectional heterogeneity at the community scale, while accrual TPL, a new extension based on sample accrual, captures heterogeneity accumulation at the metacommunity scale and appears less scale-dependent. SPL provides a tool for relating environmental heterogeneity to diversity, supporting the reciprocity principle with ecological heterogeneity. Among the four diversity power laws, DHR, using the variance-to-mean ratio as a direct heterogeneity metric, is most aligned with the diversity-heterogeneity nexus. The triple power law methodology reveals that heterogeneity scaling predicts diversity scaling in the majority of models, with the strongest predictive relationships observed for accrual TPL at higher diversity orders. Nevertheless, the commonly assumed scale-invariance proved elusive, occurring in fewer than 20% of the power law models tested. This framework may extend beyond microbiome ecosystem to any complex system where heterogeneity and diversity arise from interacting components, from ecosystems to economies to artificial intelligence.
- organism: human
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Investigating macroecological patterns in coarse-grained microbial communities using the stochastic logistic model of growth
W. R. Shoemaker, J. Grilli·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2023
- Ecological Scaling of Temporal Fluctuations with Bacterial Abundance in Gut Microbiota Depends on Functional Properties of Individual Microbial Species and Bacterial Communities
Peng Su, Konstantine Tchourine, Dennis Vitkup·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2024
- Estimation, testing, and inference of network heterogeneity
Zhanshan Sam Ma, Aaron M. Ellison·bioRxiv·May 11, 2026
- Laws of diversity and variation in microbial communities
J. Grilli·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2019
- Density dependence promotes species coexistence and provides a unifying explanation for distinct productivity-diversity relationships
Liang Xu, Christopher A. Klausmeier, Emily J. Zakem·Ecology LettersPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2025
- Microbial Ecosystems Reveal a Universal Signature of Ecological Assembly
James Holehouse, Christopher P. Kempes, … Anshuman Swain·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2026