Tractometry reproducibility and generalizability across scanners, scanner models, and acquisition protocols
Daiki TagumaiD, Isao YokoiiD, Takuji KinjoiD, Shuhei Tsuchida, Toshikazu MiyataiD, Tetsuya MatsudaiD, Garikoitz Lerma‐UsabiagaiD, Hiromasa TakemuraiD
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI)-based tractometry enables the quantification of white matter tissue properties in living humans while preserving anatomical specificity. Although tractometry is highly reproducible when the same scanner and acquisition protocol are used, its generalizability across scanners and protocols remains unclear. To address this gap, we performed a traveling-head experiment involving five subjects to evaluate tractometry across progressively different acquisition conditions, including multiple scanners, different scanner models, and two distinct protocols. Tractometry was performed for 20 major white matter tracts using diffusion tensor imaging metrics, neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) metrics, and a semi-quantitative ratio metric (T1w/b0). Generalizability across dataset pairs was quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Tractometry showed consistently high ICCs when the scanner and protocol were identical; however, ICCs declined as differences in scanner model and acquisition protocol increased. Fractional anisotropy and orientation dispersion index retained relatively high ICCs across these comparisons, whereas other metrics showed marked declines when scanners or protocols differed. ComBat harmonization partially mitigated these declines, but ICCs did not reach the levels observed for datasets acquired using identical scanners and protocols. Finally, the minimum detectable change (MDC) for tractometry in datasets pooled across scanners and protocols varied by tract; for example, the optic radiation showed a lower MDC than the cingulum hippocampus. These findings highlight both the strengths and limitations of tractometry in multisite studies and highlight the importance of quantifying scanner- and protocol-dependent effects for specific metrics and tracts when interpreting measurements from heterogeneous datasets.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reproducibility of Diffusion, Shape, and Connectivity Metrics Across Scanners: Implications for Multi-Site Tractography
Sachit Anand, Fang-Cheng F. Yeh, Siva Venkadesh·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2026
- Evaluating the reliability of human brain white matter tractometry
John Kruper, Jason D. Yeatman, … Ariel Rokem·Aperture NeuroPeer-reviewed·Nov 17, 2021
- Tractography Reproducibility Challenge with Empirical Data (TraCED): The 2017 ISMRM Diffusion Study Group Challenge
Vishwesh Nath, Kurt G. Schilling, … Bennett A. Landman·Journal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingPeer-reviewed·Jun 9, 2019
- TRAMFIX: TRavelling Across Melbourne for FIXel-based analysis (a reproducibility study)
Remika Mito, Sila Genc, … Andrew Zalesky·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2025
- Fiber tractography bundle segmentation depends on scanner effects, vendor effects, acquisition resolution, diffusion sampling scheme, diffusion sensitization, and bundle segmentation workflow
Kurt G. Schilling, Chantal M. W. Tax, … Bennett A. Landman·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 4, 2021
- How Does White Matter Registration Affect Tractography Alignment?
Gabriele Amorosino, Emanuele Olivetti, … Paolo Avesani·IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)Peer-reviewed·Apr 18, 2023