Prefrontal Manifold Geometry Explains Reaction Time Variability
Abstract
The stochastic drift-diffusion model proposes that the variability in reaction time is due to randomness during the accumulation of evidence until a decision threshold is reached. However, the neural mechanisms that explain both the randomness and implementation of the decision threshold in the model remain unclear. Here we address these questions using the dynamical systems approach to analyze primate frontal eye field activity and using microstimulation for causal manipulations. We built a mechanistic model in which signals associated with motor plans are bumped out of their attractor state by go-cue signals that emerge [~]60 ms after the go cue. The network then travels through a transition subspace towards a movement-initation subspace that emerges [~]35 ms before movement onset and implements the decision threshold. We postulate that the randomness in evidence accumulation, and hence in reaction times, is explained by the amplification of noise during movement preparation by the geometry of the frontal eye field manifold.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Distinct sources of deterministic and stochastic components of action timing decisions in rodent frontal cortex
Masayoshi Murakami, Hanan Shteingart, … Zachary F. Mainen·NeuronPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2017
- The neural basis for response latency in a sensory-motor behavior
Joonyeol Lee, Timothy R. Darlington, Stephen G. Lisberger·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Nov 2, 2019
- Motor selection dynamics in FEF explain the reaction time variance of saccades to single targets
Christopher K. Hauser, Dantong Zhu, … Emilio Salinas·eLifePeer-reviewed·Apr 13, 2018
- Slow drift of neural activity as a signature of impulsivity in macaque visual and prefrontal cortex
Benjamin R. Cowley, Adam C. Snyder, … Matthew A. Smith·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Aug 17, 2020
- Transient neuronal suppression for exploitation of new sensory evidence
Maxwell Shinn, Daeyeol Lee, … Hyojung Seo·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 10, 2022
- Frontal Eye Field inactivation diminishes Superior Colliculus activity, but delayed saccadic accumulation governs reaction time increases
Tyler R. Peel, Suryadeep Dash, … Brian D. Corneil·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 31, 2017