Rapid and objective assessment of auditory temporal processing using dynamic amplitude-modulated stimuli
Satyabrata ParidaiD, Kimberly Yurasits, Victoria E. Cancel, Maggie E ZinkiD, Claire Mitchell, Meredith C. ZiliakiD, Audrey V. Harrison, Edward L. BartlettiD, Aravindakshan ParthasarathyiD
Abstract
Auditory neural coding of speech-relevant temporal cues can be noninvasively probed using envelope following responses (EFRs), neural ensemble responses phase-locked to the stimulus amplitude envelope. EFRs emphasize different neural generators, such as the auditory brainstem or auditory cortex, by altering the temporal modulation rate of the stimulus. EFRs can be an important diagnostic tool to assess auditory neural coding deficits that go beyond traditional audiometric estimations. Existing approaches to measure EFRs use discrete amplitude modulated (AM) tones of varying modulation frequencies, which is time consuming and inefficient, impeding clinical translation. Here we present a faster and more efficient framework to measure EFRs across a range of AM frequencies using stimuli that dynamically vary in modulation rates, combined with spectrally specific analyses that offer optimal spectrotemporal resolution. EFRs obtained from several species (humans, Mongolian gerbils, Fischer-344 rats, and Cba/CaJ mice) showed robust, high-SNR tracking of dynamic AM trajectories (up to 800Hz in humans, and 1.4 kHz in rodents), with a fivefold decrease in recording time and thirtyfold increase in spectrotemporal resolution. EFR amplitudes between dynamic AM stimuli and traditional discrete AM tokens within the same subjects were highly correlated (94% variance explained) across species. Hence, we establish a time-efficient and spectrally specific approach to measure EFRs. These results could yield novel clinical diagnostics for precision audiology approaches by enabling rapid, objective assessment of temporal processing along the entire auditory neuraxis.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Field percentile
- top 22%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Chirp analyzer for estimating amplitude and latency of steady-state auditory envelope following responses
Eduardo Martínez-Montes, Yalina García‐Puente, … Pavel Prado·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Oct 21, 2020
- Children with amblyaudia show less flexibility in auditory cortical entrainment to periodic non-speech sounds
Sara Momtaz, Deborah W. Moncrieff, … Gavin M. Bidelman·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2022
- Efficient modular system identification provides a high-resolution assay of temporal processing and reveals the multilevel effects of attention along the human auditory pathway
Ravinderjit Singh, Hari Bharadwaj·bioRxiv·Aug 11, 2024
- Rapid FFR: A rapid method for obtaining Frequency Following Responses
Jonas Huber, Tim Schoof, … Stuart Rosen·bioRxiv·May 20, 2025
- Individualized Assays of Temporal Coding in the Ascending Human Auditory System
Agudemu Borjigin, Alexandra R. Hustedt-Mai, Hari Bharadwaj·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Feb 22, 2022
- Functional significance of spectrotemporal response functions obtained using magnetoencephalography
Francisco Cervantes Constantino, Marisel Villafañe-Delgado, … Jonathan Z. Simon·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2017