Metabarcoding lake sediments: taphonomy and representation of contemporary vegetation in environmental DNA (eDNA) records
I. G. Alsos, Y. Lammers, N. G. Yoccoz, T. Joergensen, P. Sjoegren, L. Gielly, M. E. Edwards
Abstract
Metabarcoding of lake sediments may reveal current and past biodiversity, but little is known about the degree to which taxa growing in the vegetation are represented in environmental DNA (eDNA) records. We analysed composition of lake and catchment vegetation and vascular plant eDNA at 11 lakes in northern Norway. Out of 489 records of taxa growing within 2 m from the lake shore, 17-49% (mean 31%) of the identifiable taxa recorded were detected with eDNA. Of the 217 eDNA records, 73% and 12% matched taxa recorded in vegetation surveys within 2 m and up to about 50 m away from the lakeshore, respectively, whereas 16% were not recorded in the vegetation surveys of the same lake. The latter include taxa likely overlooked in the vegetation surveys or growing outside the survey area. The percentages detected were 61, 47, 25, and 15 for dominant, common, scattered, and rare taxa, respectively. Similar numbers for aquatic plants were 88, 88, 33 and 62%, respectively. Detection rate and taxonomic resolution varied among plant families and functional groups with good detection of e.g. Ericaceae, Roseaceae, deciduous trees, ferns, club mosses and aquatics. The representation of terrestrial taxa in eDNA depends on both their distance from the sampling site and their abundance and is sufficient for recording vegetation types. For aquatic vegetation, eDNA may be comparable with, or even superior to, in-lake vegetation surveys and therefore be used as an tool for biomonitoring. For reconstruction of terrestrial vegetation, technical improvements and more intensive sampling is needed to detect a higher proportion of rare taxa although DNA of some taxa may never reach the lake sediments due to taphonomical constrains. Nevertheless, eDNA performs similar to conventional methods of pollen and macrofossil analyses and may therefore be an important tool for reconstruction of past vegetation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Environmental DNA of aquatic macrophytes: the potential for reconstructing past and present vegetation and environments
A. Reveret, D. P. Rijal, … I. G. Alsos·Freshwater BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2023
- eDNA metabarcoding outperforms traditional fisheries sampling and reveals fine-scale heterogeneity in a temperate freshwater lake
Rebecca R. Gehri, Wesley A. Larson, … Yue Shi·Environmental DNAPeer-reviewed·May 6, 2021
- Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water
Luke E. Holman, Mark de Bruyn, … Marc Rius·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 9, 2019
- Fishing for mammals: landscape-level monitoring of terrestrial and semi-aquatic communities using eDNA from lotic ecosystems
N. G. Sales, M. McKenzie, … A. McDevitt·bioRxiv·May 9, 2019
- Effects of species traits and ecosystem characteristics on species detection by eDNA metabarcoding in lake fish communities
H. Doi, S. Matsuoka, … M. Miya·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2020
- Environmental DNA metabarcoding for biodiversity monitoring of a highly-diverse tropical fish community in a coral-reef lagoon: Estimation of species richness and detection of habitat segregation