Extracting deep learning based morphology segmentation footprint for boar sperm cells
Joonhyung Park, Megan Ratka, Angona BiswasiD, Ian Shofner, Karl C. KernsiD, Anwesha SarkariD
Abstract
Reliable delineation of the head and tail of swine spermatozoa supports automated assessment of boar semen quality, from morphometric measurement to the quality control of insemination doses. In practice this relies on fluorescent staining, which adds chemistry, cost, and delay to every acquisition and labels only the nucleus. Recent work coupling imaging flow cytometry with machine learning has advanced rapidly, yet the segmentation stage still depends on a stained channel at inference and resolves the head alone. We present a supervised encoder decoder network that segments boar spermatozoa from brightfield images acquired on an Amnis ImageStream Mark II with no stain at inference. Training labels derive from the Hoechst 33342 nuclear channel (Ch7), recorded in registration with brightfield (Ch1); the dye serves only as an annotation source, and the network sees Ch1 alone. The best semantic segmentation model reaches a Dice coefficient of 0.940 on held-out cells. For comparison we evaluate a classical morphological pipeline, four further semantic segmentation models spanning three decoder families and two ImageNet-pretrained backbones, and two zero-shot pipelines built on the Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM 2), prompted either by a dilated box around the predicted head mask or by head and tail boxes emitted by a Gemma 4 Vision Language Model (VLM). The zero-shot route scores 0.637 against Ch7 but labels the tail, which the fluorescence protocol cannot. Cells scoring worst under the supervised model proved to be mostly registration failures rather than segmentation failures, as Ch7 is displaced relative to Ch1. Manual screening for this drift is infeasible at dataset scale, so we propose a flagging system that marks any Dice below 0.792, two standard deviations below the mean, and pairs it with a zero-shot pipeline in which a VLM l and SAM 2 cross-check the flagged cell before human review.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Deep Learning-enabled Sperm Morphology Analysis of Bovine Sperm for label-free Imaging Flow Cytometry
Anel Umirbaeva, Andrey Kurenkov, … Natasha S. Barteneva·Frontiers in Veterinary SciencePeer-reviewed·May 8, 2026
- Convolutional Neural Network-Based Instance Segmentation Algorithm to Acquire Quantitative Criteria of Early Mouse Development
Yuta Tokuoka, Takahiro Yamada, … Akira Funahashi·npj Systems Biology and ApplicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 20, 2020
- Combining Deep Learning and Active Contours Opens The Way to Robust, Automated Analysis of Brain Cytoarchitectonics
Konstantin Thierbach, Pierre‐Louis Bazin, … Nico Scherf·Lecture notes in computer sciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2018
- Computer-assisted segmentation-free analysis for long-term assessment of flagellar beating in free swimming human spermatozoa: the role of emptying calcium stores
G. Corkidi, P. Hernandez-Herrera, … A. Darszon·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2020
- Cellpose-SAM: superhuman generalization for cellular segmentation
Marius Pachitariu, Michael Rariden, Carsen Stringer·bioRxiv·Apr 28, 2025
- HistoFlow: Label-Efficient and Interactive Deep Learning Cell Analysis
Tim Henning, Benjamin Bergner, Christoph Lippert·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2020