Two cortical representations of voice control are differentially involved in speech fluency
Nicole Eva NeefiD, Annika PrimaßiniD, Alexander Wolff von GudenbergiD, Peter DechentiD, Christian Heiner RiedeliD, Walter PaulusiD, Martin SommeriD
Abstract
Recent studies have identified two distinct cortical representations of voice control in humans, the ventral and the dorsal laryngeal motor cortex. Strikingly, while persistent developmental stuttering has been linked to a white matter deficit in the ventral laryngeal motor cortex, intensive fluency shaping intervention modulated the functional connectivity of the dorsal laryngeal motor cortical network. Currently, it is unknown whether the underlying structural network organization of these two laryngeal representations is distinct or differently shaped by stuttering intervention. Using probabilistic diffusion tractography in 22 individuals who stutter and participated in a fluency shaping intervention, in 18 individuals who stutter and did not participate in the intervention, and in 28 control participants, we here compare structural networks of the dorsal laryngeal motor cortex and the ventral laryngeal motor cortex and test intervention-related white matter changes. We show (i) that all participants have weaker ventral laryngeal motor cortex connections compared to the dorsal laryngeal motor cortex network, regardless of speech fluency, (ii) connections of the ventral laryngeal motor cortex were stronger in fluent speakers, (iii) the connectivity profile of the ventral laryngeal motor cortex predicted stuttering severity, (iv) but the ventral laryngeal motor cortex network is resistant to a fluency shaping intervention. Our findings substantiate a weaker structural organization of the ventral laryngeal motor cortical network in developmental stuttering and imply that assisted recovery supports neural compensation rather than normalization. Moreover, the resulting dissociation provides evidence for functionally segregated roles of the ventral laryngeal motor cortical and dorsal laryngeal motor cortical networks.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 13
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Field percentile
- top 18%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Fluency shaping increases integration of the command-to-execution and the auditory-to-motor pathways in persistent developmental stuttering
Alexandra Korzeczek, Annika Primaßin, … Nicole Eva Neef·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 16, 2021
- Cortical tracking of speech is reduced in adults who stutter when listening for speaking
Simone Gastaldon, Pierpaolo Busan, … Mikel Lizarazu·Journal of Speech Language and Hearing ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2024
- The neural circuitry underlying the "rhythm effect" in stuttering
Saul A. Frankford, Elizabeth S. Heller Murray, … Frank H. Guenther·Journal of Speech Language and Hearing ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2021
- Differential causal involvement of human auditory and frontal cortices in vocal motor control
Araceli Ramirez-Cardenas, Roozbeh Behroozmand, … Jeremy D.W. Greenlee·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2020
- Does over-reliance on auditory feedback cause disfluency? An fMRI study of induced fluency in people who stutter.
Sophie Meekings, Kyle M. Jasmin, … Sophie Kerttu Scott·bioRxiv·Nov 18, 2020
- Transcranial direct current stimulation over left inferior frontal cortex improves speech fluency in adults who stutter
Jennifer Chesters, Riikka Möttönen, Kate Emma Watkins·BrainPeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2018