Optimal parameters for Rapid invisible Frequency Tagging using MEG
Abstract
Frequency tagging has been demonstrated to be a useful tool for identifying representational-specific neuronal activity in the auditory and visual domains. However, the slow flicker (<30Hz) applied in conventional frequency tagging studies is highly visible and might entrain endogenous neuronal oscillations. Hence, stimulation at faster frequencies that is much less visible and does not interfere with endogenous brain oscillatory activity is a promising new tool. In this study, we set out to examine the optimal stimulation parameters of rapid invisible frequency tagging (RFT/RIFT) with magnetoencephalography (MEG) by quantifying the effects of stimulation frequency, size and position of the flickering patch. Rapid frequency tagging (RFT) using flickers above 50 Hz results in almost invisible stimulation which does not interfere with slower endogenous oscillations; however, the signal is weaker as compared to tagging at slower frequencies so the optimal parameters of stimulation delivery are crucial. The here presented results examining the frequency range between 60Hz and 96Hz suggest that RFT induces brain responses with decreasing strength up to about 84Hz. In addition, even at the smallest flicker patch (2{degrees}) focally presented RFT induces a significant oscillatory brain signal at the stimulation frequency (66Hz); however, the elicited response increases with patch size. While focal RFT presentation elicits the strongest response, off-centre presentations do generally mainly elicit a measureable response if presented below the horizontal midline. The results also revealed considerable individual differences in the neuronal responses of to RFT stimulation. Finally, we discuss the comparison of oscillatory measures (coherence and power) and sensor types (planar gradiometers and magnetometers) in order to achieve optimal outcomes. Based on our extensive findings we set forward concrete recommendations for using rapid frequency tagging in human cognitive neuroscience investigations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 27
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Field percentile
- top 5%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Perceptual Foundation and Extension to Phase Tagging for Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging (RIFT)
Eelke Spaak, Floortje G. Bouwkamp, Floris P. de Lange·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging (RIFT) with a consumer monitor: A proof-of-concept
Olaf Dimigen, Ioana Badea, … Mark M. Span·Journal of Neuroscience MethodsPeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2025
- Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging (RIFT) in a novel setup with EEG
Kabir Arora, Surya Gayet, … Samson Chota·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2024
- Covert attentional tracking with invisible phase tagging
Kabir Arora, Klara Žinkovič, … Samson Chota·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2026
- Tracking attention using RIFT with a consumer-monitor setup
Kabir Arora, Ü. Gülce Çelik, … Samson Chota·bioRxiv·Oct 3, 2025
- Application of rapid invisible frequency tagging for brain computer interfaces
Marion Brickwedde, Yulia Bezsudnova, … Alexander Zhigalov·Journal of Neuroscience MethodsPeer-reviewed·Oct 10, 2022