bioRxivNeuroscience
Cortico-striatal action control inherent of opponent cognitive-motivational styles
Abstract
Turning on cue or stopping at a red light requires attending to such cues to select action sequences, or suppress action, in accordance with learned cue-associated action rules. Cortico-striatal projections are an essential part of the brains attention-motor interface. Glutamate-sensing microelectrode arrays were used to measure glutamate transients in the dorsomedial striatum (DMS) of male and female rats walking a treadmill and executing cued turns and stops. Prelimbic-DMS projections were chemogenetically inhibited to determine their behavioral necessity and the cortico-striatal origin of cue-evoked glutamate transients. Furthermore, we investigated rats exhibiting preferably goal-directed (goal trackers, GTs) versus cue-driven attention (sign trackers, STs), to determine the impact of such cognitive-motivational biases on cortico-striatal control. GTs executed more cued turns and initiated such turns more slowly than STs. During turns, but not missed turns or cued stops, cue-evoked glutamate concentrations were higher in GTs than in STs. In STs, turn cue-locked glutamate concentrations frequently peaked twice or three times, contrasting with predominately single peaks in GTs. In GTs, but not STs, inhibition of prelimbic-DMS projections attenuated turn rates and turn cue-evoked glutamate concentrations and increased the number of turn cue-locked glutamate peaks. These findings indicate that turn cue-evoked glutamate release in GTs is tightly controlled by cortico-striatal neuronal activity. In contrast, in STs, glutamate release from DMS glutamatergic terminals may be regulated by other striatal circuitry, preferably mediating cued suppression of action and reward tracking. As cortico-striatal dysfunction has been hypothesized to contribute to a wide range of disorders, including complex movement control deficits in Parkinsons disease and compulsive drug taking, the demonstration of phenotypic contrasts in cortico-striatal control implies the presence of individual vulnerabilities for such disorders. Significance StatementAdaptive behavior involves the selection of behaviorally significant cues and the capacity of selected cues to control behavioral action. Neuronal projections from cortex to striatum are essential for such an integration of attentional with motor functions. Here we demonstrated that glutamate release from cortico-striatal projections primarily influences cued turns but not cued suppression of actions (cued stops). Cortico-striatal control of cued turning was especially powerful in rats which, as a psychological trait, preferably deploy goal-directed attention. Together, our findings demonstrate the role of cortico-striatal input in cued action selection, and they emphasize the experimental and biopsychological significance of investigating the brains attentional-motor interface in the context of broader individual differences in cognitive-motivational styles.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Opposing Influence of Sensory and Motor Cortical Input on Striatal Circuitry and Choice Behavior
Christian R. Lee, Alex J. Yonk, … David J. Margolis·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2019
- Opponent control of behavior by dorsomedial striatal pathways depends on task demands and internal state
Scott S. Bolkan, Iris R. Stone, … Ilana B. Witten·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2022
- Changes in dorsomedial striatum activity mediate expression of goal-directed vs. habit-like cue-induced cocaine seeking
Brooke N. Bender, Sierra J. Stringfield, Mary M. Torregrossa·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2023
- Controlling striatal function via anterior frontal cortex stimulation
Mieke van Holstein, Monja I. Froböse, … Roshan Cools·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Feb 13, 2018
- Top-down corticostriatal gating of adaptive restraint during motivational conflict
Elizabeth Illescas-Huerta, Eduardo Hernández-Ortiz, Francisco Sotres-Bayón·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2026
- The Neurochemical Mechanisms Underlying the Enhancing Effects of Rewards and Punishments on Motor Performance
Raphaël Hamel, Joshua Pearson, … Joseph M. Galea·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2023