DNA motifs are not general predictors of recombination in two Drosophila sister species.
James Malcolm HowieiD, Rupert MazzuccoiD, Thomas Taus, Viola NolteiD, Christian SchlöttereriD
Abstract
Meiotic recombination is crucial for chromosomal segregation, and facilitates the spread of beneficial and removal of deleterious mutations. Recombination rates frequently vary along chromosomes and Drosophila melanogaster exhibits a remarkable pattern. Recombination rates gradually decrease towards centromeres and telomeres, with dramatic impact on levels of variation in natural populations. Two close sister species, D. simulans and D. mauritiana do not only have higher recombination rates, but also exhibit a much more homogeneous recombination rate that only drops sharply close to centromeres and telomeres. Because certain sequence motifs are associated with recombination rate variation in D. melanogaster, we tested whether the difference in recombination landscape between D. melanogaster and D. simulans can be explained by the genomic distribution of recombination-rate associated sequence motifs. We constructed the first high resolution recombination map for D. simulans, and searched for motifs linked with high recombination in both sister species. We identified five consensus motifs, present in either species. While the association between motif density and recombination is strong and positive in D. melanogaster, the results are equivocal in D. simulans. Despite the strong association in D. melanogaster, we do not find a decreasing density of these repeat motifs towards centromeres and telomeres. We conclude that the density of recombination-associated repeat motifs cannot explain the large-scale recombination landscape in D. melanogaster, nor the differences to D. simulans. The strong association seen for the sequence motifs in D. melanogaster likely reflects their impact influencing local differences in recombination rates along the genome.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 28
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Recombining without hotspots: A comprehensive evolutionary portrait of recombination in two closely related species of Drosophila
Caiti Smukowski Heil, Chris Ellison, … Mohamed Noor·Genome Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2015
- The recombination landscape of Drosophila melanogaster can be repatterned by a single gene
Stacie E. Hughes, Cynthia J. Staber, … R. Scott Hawley·bioRxiv·May 16, 2025
- DNA sequence differences are determinants of meiotic recombination outcome
Simon Brown, Samantha J. Mpaulo, … Alexander Lorenz·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 11, 2019
- Variation in mutation, recombination, and transposition rates in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans
Y. Wang, P. McNeil, … D. J. Obbard·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2022
- Sex-specific recombination landscape in a species with holocentric chromosomes
Sebastian Chmielewski, Mateusz Konczal, … Wiesław Babik·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 16, 2025
- The recombinational landscape in Daphnia pulex