Aperiodic activity as a central neural feature of hypnotic susceptibility outside of hypnosis
Mathieu LandryiD, Jason da Silva CastanheiraiD, Catherine Boisvert, Floriane RousseauxiD, Jérôme SackuriD, Amir RaziD, Philippe RichebéiD, David OgeziD, Pierre RainvilleiD, Karim JerbiiD
Abstract
How well a person responds to hypnosis is a stable trait, which exhibits considerable inter-individual diversity across the general population. Yet, its neural underpinning remains elusive. Here, we address this gap by combining EEG data, multivariate statistics, and machine learning in order to identify brain patterns that differentiate between individuals high and low in susceptibility to hypnosis. In particular, we computed the periodic and aperiodic components of the EEG power spectrum, as well as graph theoretical measures derived from functional connectivity, from data acquired at rest (pre-induction) and under hypnosis (post-induction). We found that the 1/f slope of the EEG spectrum at rest was the best predictor of hypnotic susceptibility. Our findings support the idea that hypnotic susceptibility is a trait linked to the balance of cortical excitation and inhibition at baseline and offers novel perspectives on the neural foundations of hypnotic susceptibility. Future work can explore the contribution of background 1/f activity as a novel target to distinguish the responsiveness of individuals to hypnosis at baseline in the clinic. Significance StatementHypnotic phenomena reflect the ability to alter ones subjective experiences based on targeted verbal suggestions. This ability varies greatly in the population. The brain correlates to explain this variability remain elusive. Addressing this gap, our study employs machine learning to predict hypnotic susceptibility. By recording electroencephalography (EEG) before and after a hypnotic induction and analyzing diverse neurophysiological features, we were able to determine that several features differentiate between high and low hypnotic susceptible individuals both at baseline and during hypnosis. Our analysis revealed that the paramount discriminative feature is non-oscillatory EEG activity before the induction--a new finding in the field. This outcome aligns with the idea that hypnotic susceptibility represents a latent trait observable through a plain five-minutes resting-state EEG.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Spectral and topological analysis of the cortical representation of the head position: does hypnotizability matter?
Esther Ibáñez‐Marcelo, Lisa Campioni, … Giovanni Petri·Brain and BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Apr 18, 2019
- Teaching a computer to assess hypnotic depth: A pilot study
Nikita V. Obukhov, Peter L. N. Naish, … Ilya A. Martynov·bioRxiv·Nov 13, 2021
- Resting-state aperiodic neural activity as a novel objective marker of daytime somnolence
Zachariah R. Cross, T Kang, … Alex Chatburn·bioRxiv·Aug 7, 2022
- Decoding hypnotic consciousness: neural and experiential insights into induced and ideomotor suggestions
Juliette Gélébart, Alexandre Fouré, … Ursula Debarnot·Neuroscience of ConsciousnessPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Salient 40 Hz sounds probe affective aversion and neural excitability
Felix Schneefeld, Keith B. Doelling, … Luc H. Arnal·bioRxiv·Feb 26, 2022
- Aperiodic slope reflects glutamatergic tone in the human brain
Aislin A. Sheldon, Hannah R. Moser, … Michael‐Paul Schallmo·Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 9, 2026