NeuroImageNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Electroencephalographic evidence for the involvement of mirror neuron and error monitoring related processes in virtual body ownership
Gal RaziD, Guy GurevitchiD, Tom Vaknin, Araz Aazamy, Iddo Gefen, Stanislaw Grunstein, Gal Azouri, Noam GoldwayiD
Abstract
The illusion that an artificial or virtual object becomes part of ones body has been demonstrated and productively investigated in the past two decades. Empirical and theoretical accounts of this phenomenon suggest that the body ownership illusion relies not on a single process, but rather on the alignment of the biological and the alternative bodies across multiple aspects. However, the portrayal of these aspects and the demarcation of their neurophysiological correlates has yet to be established.\n\nOur study examines electroencephalographic (EEG) markers of two extensively studied systems in the context of virtual body ownership illusion: the mirror neuron system (MNS) and the error monitoring system (EMS). We designed an experimental manipulation of brief involuntary virtual hand bounces, which triggers both systems, and examined how the response of EEG markers of these systems to this manipulation is modulated by three aspects of body ownership: agency, visuotactile synchronicity, and semantic congruence between the participants hands and its virtual representation.\n\nWe found evidence for enhanced MNS-related suppression of power at the Mu band in the synchronous and semantic congruence conditions. On the other hand, the EMS-related Pe/P300 wave was reduced by semantic congruence. This Pe/P300 effect was stronger among participants who exhibited higher acceptance of the spatial illusion and increased tendency for affective empathy. Mu power and Pe/P300 were not correlated, suggesting a dissociation between the distinct aspects of body ownership they probe. The findings suggest that synchronicity and semantic congruence induce sensorimotor sensitivity to the alternative body, whereas the latter parameter also buffers minor erroneous virtual motions. These neurophysiological markers may be added to the arsenal of body ownership probes, and integrated in VR rehabilitation protocols.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 30
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Field percentile
- top 10%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- EEG signature of breaks in embodiment in VR
Thibault Porssut, Fumiaki Iwane, … Bruno Herbelin·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·May 11, 2023
- Disruption by virtual reality of the cortical oscillations related to visuotactile integration during an embodiment process
Noriaki Kanayama, Masayuki Hara, Kenta Kimura·bioRxiv·Mar 27, 2020
- Neurophysiological Correlates Of The Rubber Hand Illusion In Evoked And Oscillatory Brain Activity
Isa S. Rao, Christoph Kayser·Frontiers in Human NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 24, 2017
- Neural correlates of an illusionary sense of agency caused by virtual reality
Yiyang Cai, Huichao Yang, … Kunlin Wei·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Dec 30, 2023
- Absence of reliable physiological signature of illusory body ownership revealed by f ine-grained autonomic measurement during the rubber hand illusion
Hugo Critchley, Vanessa Botan, Jamie Ward·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2021
- Feeling Senseless Sensations: A Crossmodal study of mismatching tactile and virtual visual experience
Caroline Lehser, Steven A. Hillyard, Daniel J. Strauß·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2024