medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
Genome sequencing as a first-line diagnostic test for hospitalized newborns
Kevin M. BowlingiD, Michelle L. ThompsoniD, Candice R. FinnilaiD, Susan M. HiattiD, Donald R. LatneriD, Michelle D. Amaral, James M.J. LawloriD, Kelly M. EastiD, Meagan E. Cochran, Veronica GreveiD, Whitley V. Kelley, David E. Gray, Stephanie A. FelkeriD, Hannah Meddaugh, Ashley D. CannoniD, Amanda Luedecke, Kelly E. Jackson, Laura Godfrey HendoniD, Hillary M. Janani, Marla Johnston, Lee Ann Merin, Sarah L. Deans, Carly Tuura, Heather E. WilliamsiD, Kelly LabordeiD, , Gregory M. CooperiD
Abstract
PurposeSouthSeq, a translational research study to perform genome sequencing (GS) for infants with symptoms suggestive of a genetic disorder, was conducted in NICUs in the Southeastern US. Recruitment targeted racial/ethnic minorities and rural, medically underserved areas that are historically under-represented in genomic medicine research. MethodsGS and analysis were performed for 367 newborns to detect disease-causal genetic variation concurrent with standard of care evaluation and testing. ResultsDefinitive diagnostic (DD) or likely diagnostic (LD) genetic findings were identified in 30% of newborns and 14% harbored an uncertain result. Only 39% of DD/LD findings were identified via concurrent standard of care suggesting that GS testing is better for obtaining early genetic diagnosis. We also identified phenotypes that correlate with the likelihood of receiving a DD/LD finding, such as craniofacial, ophthalmologic, auditory, skin, and hair abnormalities. We did not observe any differences in diagnostic rates between racial/ethnic groups. ConclusionWe describe one of the largest to-date GS cohorts of ill newborns, enriched for African American and rural patients. Our results demonstrate the utility of GS as it provides early in life detection of clinically relevant genetic variation not identified via current standard clinical testing, particularly for newborns exhibiting certain phenotypic features.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- SeqFirst: Building equity access to a precise genetic diagnosis in critically ill newborns
Tara Lynn Wenger, Abbey A. Scott, … Michael J. Bamshad·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 24, 2025
- Clinical genome sequencing: three years experience at a tertiary childrens hospital
Runjun D. Kumar, Lisa F. Saba, … Jennifer C. Scull·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jun 16, 2023
- Rapid Genome Sequencing Compared to a Gene Panel in Critically Ill Infants with a Suspected Genetic Disorder: An Economic Evaluation
Tara A. Lavelle, Jill L. Maron, … Jonathan M. Davis·The Journal of PediatricsPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2025
- Molecular diagnostic yield of genome sequencing versus targeted gene panel testing in racially and ethnically diverse pediatric patients
Noura S. Abul‐Husn, Priya N. Marathe, … Bruce D. Gelb·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 5, 2023
- Prospective evaluation of genome sequencing versus standard-of-care as a first molecular diagnostic test
Deanna Brockman, Christina Anne Austin-Tse, … Miriam S. Udler·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 11, 2021
- A nationwide prospective randomized trial for diagnosing developmental disorders demonstrates genome sequencing outperforms standard of care.
Mathilde Geysens, Erika L. Souche, … Joris Robert Vermeesch·medRxiv·Oct 18, 2025