bioRxivScientific Communication & Education
Facilitating Patient and Public Involvement in basic and preclinical health research.
Abstract
Involving patients in research broadens a researchers field of influence and may generate novel ideas. Preclinical research is integral to the progression of innovative healthcare. These are not patient-facing disciplines and implementing meaningful PPI can be a challenge. A discussion forum and thematic analysis identified key challenges of implementing PPI for preclinical researchers. In response we developed a \"PPI Ready\" planning canvas. For contemporaneous evaluation of PPI, a psychometric questionnaire and an open source tool for its evaluation were developed. The questionnaire measures information, procedural and quality assessment. Combined with the open source evaluation tool, researchers are notified if PPI is unsatisfactory in any of these areas. The tool is easy to use and adapts a psychometric test into a format familiar to preclinical scientists. Designed to be used iteratively across a research project, it provides a simple reporting grade to document satisfaction trend over the research lifecycle.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Involving patients and publics in medical and health care research studies: an exploratory survey on participant recruiting and representativeness from the perspective of study authors
J. Lander, H. Langhof, M.-L. Dierks·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2018
- TO BE OR NOT TO BE A PI: ADVICE FOR TRAINEES IN THE BIOMEDICAL/BASIC SCIENCES
Hei‐Yong G. Lo, Lily L. Nguyen, … Angeles B. Ribera·bioRxiv·Dec 9, 2025
- Evaluation of the capacity of Pediatricians in Nigeria to conduct of research: A nationwide Survey.
Maduka D. Ughasoro, Iliya Jalo, … Oguche Stephen·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2018
- The recognition and expectations of ex-inpatients of mental health services: A web-based questionnaire survey in Japan.
Akihiro Shiina, Yasutaka Ojio, … Chiyo Fujii·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Oct 15, 2018
- A Pilot Survey of Authors' Experiences with Poor Peer Review Practices
K. B. McCloskey, J. F. Merz·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2022
- From intent to implementation: Factors affecting public involvement in life science research
J. A. Burns, K. Korzec, E. R. Dorris·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2019