Sign in
NeuroscienceJournal of Neural Engineering
Peer-reviewed journal article

Neural tracking of the speech envelope in cochlear implant users

Ben SomersiD, Eline VerschuereniD, Tom FrancartiD

Abstract

ObjectiveWhen listening to speech, the brain tracks the speech envelope. It is possible to reconstruct this envelope from EEG recordings. However, in people who hear using a cochlear implant (CI), the artifacts caused by electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve contaminate the EEG. This causes the decoder to produce an artifact-dominated reconstruction, which does not reflect the neural signal processing. The objective of this study is to develop and validate a method for assessing the neural tracking of speech envelope in CI users.\n\nApproachTo obtain EEG recordings free of stimulus artifacts, the electrical stimulation is periodically in-terrupted. During these stimulation gaps, artifact-free EEG can be sampled and used to train a linear envelope decoder. Different recording conditions were used to characterize the artifacts and their influence on the envelope reconstruction.\n\nMain resultsThe present study demonstrates for the first time that neural tracking of the speech envelope can be measured in response to ongoing electrical stimulation. The responses were validated to be truly neural and not affected by stimulus artifact.\n\nSignificanceBesides applications in audiology and neuroscience, the characterization and elimination of stimulus artifacts will enable future EEG studies involving continuous speech in CI users. Measures of neural tracking of the speech envelope reflect interesting properties of the listeners perception of speech, such as speech intelligibility or attentional state. Successful decoding of neural envelope tracking will open new possibilities to investigate the neural mechanisms of speech perception with a CI.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
37
FWCI
2.68
Field percentile
top 10%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISVerschueren '18Jehn '26Verschueren '21Jehn '26MacIntyre '24Decruy '20
93% semantic matchNeuroscience
Eline Verschueren, Ben Somers, Tom Francart·Hearing Research·Dec 14, 2018· 59 citations