eLifeNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Effort cost of harvest affects decisions and movement vigor of marmosets during foraging
Paul HageiD, In Kyu JangiD, Vivian LooiiD, Mohammad Amin FakharianiD, Simon P. OrozcoiD, Jay S. PiiD, Ehsan Sedaghat-NejadiD, Reza ShadmehriD
Abstract
Our decisions are guided by how we perceive the value of an option, but this evaluation also affects how we move to acquire that option. Why should economic variables such as reward and effort alter the vigor of our movements? In theory, both the option that we choose and the vigor with which we move contribute to a measure of fitness in which the objective is to maximize rewards minus efforts, divided by time. To explore this idea, we engaged marmosets in a foraging task in which on each trial they decided whether to work by making saccades to visual targets, thus accumulating food, or to harvest by licking what they had earned. We varied the effort cost of harvest by moving the food tube with respect to the mouth. Theory predicted that the subjects should respond to the increased effort costs by choosing to work longer, stockpiling food before commencing harvest, but reduce their movement vigor to conserve energy. Indeed, in response to an increased effort cost of harvest, marmosets extended their work duration, but slowed their movements. These changes in decisions and movements coincided with changes in pupil size. As the effort cost of harvest declined, work duration decreased, the pupils dilated, and the vigor of licks and saccades increased. Thus, when acquisition of reward became effortful, the pupils constricted, the decisions exhibited delayed gratification, and the movements displayed reduced vigor. Significance statementOur results suggest that as the brainstem neuromodulatory circuits that control pupil size respond to effort costs, they alter computations in the brain regions that control decisions, encouraging work and delaying gratification, and the brain regions that control movements, reducing vigor and suppressing energy expenditure. This coordinated response suggests that decisions and actions are part of a single control policy that aims to maximize a variable relevant to fitness: the capture rate.
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Field percentile
- top 27%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Optimal foraging requires coordinating decisions with movements
Clara Saleri, Gislene Gardechaux, … David Thura·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 17, 2026
- Evidence for flexible regulation of movement and decision vigor in a reward-oriented task
Adrien Conessa, Arnaud Boutin, Bastien Berret·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2025
- Effects of reward history on decision-making and movement vigor
Shruthi Sukumar, Reza Shadmehr, Alaa A. Ahmed·bioRxiv·Jul 22, 2021
- Worth the work? Monkeys discount rewards by a subjective adapting effort cost
Mark Burrell, Alexandre Pastor‐Bernier, Wolfram Schultz·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 25, 2023
- Humans anticipate the consequences of motor control demands when making perceptual decisions between actions
Élise Leroy, Éric Koun, David Thura·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2024
- Integrated control of non-motor and motor efforts during decision between actions
Élise Leroy, Éric Koun, David Thura·bioRxiv·Feb 3, 2023