Niche conservatism in a generalist felid: low differentiation of the climatic niche among subspecies of the leopard (Panthera pardus)
Abstract
AimSpecies distribution modelling can be used to reveal if the ecology of a species varies across its range, to investigate if range expansions entailed niche shifts, and to help assess ecological differentiation: the answers to such questions are vital for effective conservation. The leopard (Panthera pardus spp.) is a generalist species composed of one African and eight Asian subspecies, reflecting dispersal from an ancestral African range. This study uses species distribution models to compare the niches of leopard subspecies, to investigate if they conserved their niches when moving into new territories or adapted to local conditions and shifted niche. LocationAfrica and Eurasia MethodsWe assembled a database of P. pardus spp. presences. We then associated them with bioclimatic variables to identify which are relevant in predicting the distribution of the leopard. We then constructed a species distribution model and compared the distribution predicted from models based on presences from all subspecies versus the ones built only using African leopards. Finally, we used multivariate analysis to visualise the niche occupied by each subspecies in the climate space, and to compare niche overlaps to assess ecological differentiation. ResultsNiche comparisons and model predictions suggest a general lack of niche separation between all subspecies. Most Asian subspecies have overlapping niches and occupy subsets of the niche of the African leopard. Nevertheless, we found the Persian leopard Panthera pardus saxicolor to have the most distinct niche, giving some evidence for niche expansion in more Northern Asian subspecies. Main conclusionsThese results suggest little ecological differentiation among leopard subspecies and a lack of adaptation to novel climates after dispersal from Africa. This finding complements recent genetic studies in implying that the taxonomy of Asian leopards may not reflect biological differentiation, an issue that is important to resolve due to its relevance for the conservation of the species.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genetic analyses reveal population structure and recent decline in leopards (Panthera pardus fusca) across Indian subcontinent
Supriya Bhatt, Suvankar Biswas, … Samrat Mondol·PeerJPeer-reviewed·Feb 4, 2020
- Climate Shaped the Global Population Structure of Leopards and their Extinction in Europe
Zhe Xue, Johanna L. A. Paijmans, … Andrea Manica·bioRxiv·Oct 3, 2025
- CLIMATIC NICHE DIFFERENTIATION ACCOMPANIED THE RADIATION OF LEAF-EARED MICE IN THE PHYLLOTIS DARWINI SPECIES GROUP (SIGMODONTINAE, CRICETIDAE)
Marcial Quiroga‐Carmona, José Humberto Urquizo, … Jay F. Storz·Journal of BiogeographyPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2026
- Ecological plasticity explains the distribution of sympatric and allopatric mouse lemurs (Microcebus spp.) in northeastern Madagascar
Dominik Schüßler, Tobias van Elst, … Ute Radespiel·BiotropicaPeer-reviewed·Jun 9, 2026
- Is niche divergence more likely in parapatry? A test in Sclerurus mexicanus sensu lato (Aves: Furnariidae)
J. C. Cooper, D. Barragan Diaz·bioRxiv·Dec 6, 2022
- Historical biogeography of the leopard (Panthera pardus) and its extinct Eurasian populations
J. L. A. Paijmans, A. Barlow, … M. Hofreiter·BMC Evolutionary BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 23, 2018