Effort cost of reaching prompts vigor reduction in older adults

Abstract

As people age, they move slower. Is age-related reduction in vigor a reflection of a reduced valuation of reward by the brain, or a consequence of increased effort costs by the muscles? Here, we quantified cost of movements objectively via the metabolic energy that young and old participants consumed during reaching and found that in order reach at a given speed, older adults expended more energy than the young. We next quantified how reward modulated movements in the same populations and found that like the young, older adults responded to increased reward by initiating their movements earlier. Yet, their movements were less sensitive to increased reward, resulting in little or no modulation of reach speed. Lastly, we quantified the effect of increased effort on how reward modulated movements in young adults. Like the effects of aging, when faced with increased effort the young adults responded to reward primarily by reacting faster, with little change in movement speed. Therefore, reaching required greater energetic expenditure in the elderly, suggesting that the slower movements and reactions exhibited in aging are partly driven by an adaptive response to an elevation in the energetic landscape of effort. That is, moving slower appears to be a rational economic consequence of aging. Significance statementHealthy aging coincides with a reduction in speed, or vigor, of walking, reaching, and eye movements. Here we focused on disentangling two opposing sources of aging-related movement slowing: reduced reward sensitivity due to loss of dopaminergic tone, or increased energy expenditure movements related to mitochondrial or muscular inefficiencies. Through a series of three experiments and construction of a computational model, here we demonstrate that transient changes in reaction time and movement speed together offer a quantifiable metric to differentiate between reward- and effort-based alterations in movement vigor. Further, we suggest that objective increases in the metabolic cost of moving, not reductions in reward valuation, are driving much of the movement slowing occurring alongside healthy aging.