Mortality Selection in a Genetic Sample and Implications for Association Studies
Benjamin W Domingue, Daniel W Belsky, Amal Harrati, Dalton Conley, David Weir, Jason Boardman
Abstract
Mortality selection is a general concern in the social and health sciences. Recently, existing health and social science cohorts have begun to collect genomic data. Causes of selection into a genomic dataset can influence results from genomic analyses. Selective non-participation, which is specific to a particular study and its participants, has received attention in the literature. But mortality selection--the very general phenomenon that genomic data collected at a particular age represents selective participation by only the subset of birth cohort members who have survived to the time of data collection--has been largely ignored. Here we test the hypothesis that such mortality selection may significantly alter estimates in polygenetic association studies of both health and non-health traits. We demonstrate mortality selection into genome-wide SNP data collection at older ages using the U.S.-based Health and Retirement Study (HRS). We then model the selection process. Finally, we test whether mortality selection alters estimates from genetic association studies. We find evidence for mortality selection. Healthier and more socioeconomically advantaged individuals are more likely to survive to be eligible to participate in the genetic sample of the HRS. Mortality selection leads to modest drift in estimating time-varying genetic effects, a drift that is enhanced when estimates are produced from data that has additional mortality selection. There is no general solution for correcting for mortality selection in a birth cohort prior to entry into a longitudinal study. We illustrate how genetic association studies using HRS data can adjust for mortality selection from study entry to time of genetic data collection by including probability weights that account for mortality selection. Mortality selection should be investigated more broadly in genetically-informed samples from other cohort studies.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Biases in GWAS - the dog that did not bark
Catherine Mary Schooling·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2019
- The molecular genetics of participation in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children
Amy E. Taylor, Hannah J Jones, … Kate M. Tilling·International Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2018
- Correction for participation bias in the UK Biobank reveals non-negligible impact on genetic associations and downstream analyses
Tabea Schoeler, Doug Speed, … Zoltán Kutalik·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Apr 27, 2023
- Slope-Hunter: A robust method for index-event bias correction in genome-wide association studies of subsequent traits
Osama Mahmoud, Frank Dudbridge, … Kate M. Tilling·bioRxiv·Jan 31, 2020
- GWAS on Birth Year Infant Mortality Rates Provides New Evidence of Recent Natural Selection
Yuchang Wu, Shiro Furuya, … Qiongshi Lu·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Mar 14, 2022
- Genetic predictors of participation in optional components of UK Biobank
Jessica Tyrrell, Jie Zheng, … Kate M. Tilling·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 9, 2021