bioRxivAnimal Behavior & Cognition
Interfering with contextual fear memories by post-reactivation administration of propranolol in mice: a series of null findings
W. R. Cox, L. Faliagkas, A. Besseling, R. J. van der Loo, S. Spijker, M. Kindt, P. Rao-Ruiz
Abstract
Post-reactivation amnesia of contextual fear memories by blockade of noradrenergic signaling has been shown to have limited replicability in rodents. This is usually attributed to several boundary conditions that gate the destabilization of memory during its retrieval. How these boundary conditions can be overcome, and what neural mechanisms underlie post-reactivation changes in contextual fear memories remain largely unknown. Here, we report a series of experiments in a contextual fear-conditioning paradigm in mice, that were aimed at solving these issues. We first attempted to obtain a training paradigm that would consistently result in contextual fear memory that could be destabilized upon reactivation, enabling post-retrieval amnesia by administration of propranolol. Unexpectedly, our attempts were unsuccessful to this end. Specifically, over a series of experiments in which we varied different parameters of the fear acquisition procedure, at best small and inconsistent effects were observed. Additionally, we found that propranolol did not alter retrieval-induced neural activity, as measured by the number of c-Fos+ cells in the hippocampal dentate gyrus. To determine whether propranolol was perhaps ineffective in interfering with reactivated contextual fear memories, we also included anisomycin (i.e., a potent and well-known amnesic drug) in several experiments, and measures of synaptic glutamate receptor subunit GluA2 (i.e., a marker of memory destabilization). No post-retrieval amnesia by anisomycin and no altered GluA2 expression by reactivation was observed, suggesting that the memories did not undergo destabilization. The null findings are surprising, given that the training paradigms we implemented were previously shown to result in memories that could be modified upon reactivation. Together, our observations illustrate the elusive nature of reactivation-dependent changes of non-human fear memory.
- organism: mouse
- assay: behavioral assay
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Rats remember: Lack of drug-induced post-retrieval amnesia for auditory fear memories
Laura Luyten, Anna Elisabeth Schnell, … Tom Beckers·BMC BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 26, 2021
- Apparent Reconsolidation Interference Without Generalized Amnesia
Joaquín Matias Alfei, Hérnan De Gruy, … Tom Beckers·Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Nov 11, 2020
- Post-reactivation mifepristone impairs generalisation of strongly-conditioned contextual fear memories
Charlotte R. Flavell, Rebecca M. Gascoyne, Jonathan L. C. Lee·Learning & MemoryPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2020
- Dissociable memory modulation mechanisms facilitate fear amnesia at different timescales
Yinmei Ni, Ye Wang, … Jian Li·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 15, 2025
- Reactivating aversive memories in humans: An EEG and Microstates study of post-retrieval processes
Luciano Cavallino, Luz Bavassi, Maria Eugenia Pedreira·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2025
- Activating M1 muscarinic cholinergic receptors induces destabilization of resistant contextual fear memories in rats
Karim H. Abouelnaga·Neurobiology of Learning and MemoryPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2023