Journal of NeurophysiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Faster processing of moving compared to flashed bars in awake macaque V1 provides a neural correlate of the flash lag illusion
Manivannan SubramaniyaniD, Alexander S. EckeriD, Saumil Surendra PateliD, Ronald James CottoniD, Matthias BethgeiD, Xaq PitkowiD, Philipp BerensiD, Andreas Savas ToliasiD
Abstract
When the brain has determined the position of a moving object, due to anatomical and processing delays, the object will have already moved to a new location. Given the statistical regularities present in natural motion, the brain may have acquired compensatory mechanisms to minimize the mismatch between the perceived and the real position of a moving object. A well-known visual illusion -- the flash lag effect -- points towards such a possibility. Although many psychophysical models have been suggested to explain this illusion, their predictions have not been tested at the neural level, particularly in a species of animal known to perceive the illusion. Towards this, we recorded neural responses to flashed and moving bars from primary visual cortex (V1) of awake, fixating macaque monkeys. We found that the response latency to moving bars of varying speed, motion direction and luminance was shorter than that to flashes, in a manner that is consistent with psychophysical results. At the level of V1, our results support the differential latency model positing that flashed and moving bars have different latencies. As we found a neural correlate of the illusion in passively fixating monkeys, our results also suggest that judging the instantaneous position of the moving bar at the time of flash -- as required by the postdiction/motion-biasing model -- may not be necessary for observing a neural correlate of the illusion. Our results also suggest that the brain may have evolved mechanisms to process moving stimuli faster and closer to real time compared with briefly appearing stationary stimuli.\n\nNew and NoteworthyWe report several observations in awake macaque V1 that provide support for the differential latency model of the flash lag illusion. We find that the equal latency of flash and moving stimuli as assumed by motion integration/postdiction models does not hold in V1. We show that in macaque V1, motion processing latency depends on stimulus luminance, speed and motion direction in a manner consistent with several psychophysical properties of the flash lag illusion.
- Citations
- 42
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Field percentile
- top 11%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Early and late evoked brain responsesdifferentially reflect feature encoding andperception in the flash-lag illusion
Julian Keil, Daniel Senkowski, James Kenneth Moran·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 7, 2021
- Faster detection of "darks" than "brights" by monkey superior colliculus neurons
Tatiana Malevich, Tong Zhang, … Ziad M. Hafed·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2022
- Ocular following responses of the marmoset monkey are dependent on post-saccadic delay, spatiotemporal frequency and saccade direction
Hoi Ming Ken Yip, Timothy John Allison-Walker, … Nicholas S. C. Price·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2023
- Out of sight, out of mind: Responses in primate ventral visual cortex track individual fixations during natural vision
Will Xiao, Saloni Sharma, … Margaret S. Livingstone·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 29, 2024
- Motion extrapolation in the flash-lag effect depends on perceived, rather than physical speed
Jane Yook, Lysha Lee, … Hinze Hogendoorn·Vision ResearchPeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2021
- Beyond Inheritance: De novo Fast Motion Computation in Primate Visual Cortex
Keyan He, Lixuan Liu, … Wei Wang·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2025