Genomic sequencing identifies secondary findings in a cohort of parent study participants
Michelle L. ThompsoniD, Candice R. FinnilaiD, Kevin M. BowlingiD, Kyle Bertram BrothersiD, Matthew B. NeuiD, Michelle D. Amaral, Susan M. HiattiD, Kelly M. EastiD, David E. Gray, James M.J. LawloriD, Whitley V. Kelley, Edward J. Lose, Carla A. RichiD, Shirley Simmons, Shawn LevyiD, R MyersiD, Gregory S. BarshiD, Elizabeth Martina BebiniD, Gregory M. CooperiD
Abstract
PURPOSEClinically relevant secondary variants were identified in parents enrolled with a child with developmental delay and intellectual disability.\n\nMETHODSExome/genome sequencing and analysis of 789 unaffected parents was performed.\n\nRESULTSPathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were identified in 21 genes within 25 individuals (3.2%), with 11 (1.4%) participants harboring variation in a gene defined as clinically actionable by the ACMG. Of the 25 individuals, five carried a variant consistent with a previous clinical diagnosis, thirteen were not previously diagnosed but had symptoms or family history with probable association with the detected variant, and seven reported no symptoms or family history of disease. A limited carrier screen was performed yielding 15 variants in 48 (6.1%) parents. Parents were also analyzed as mate-pairs to identify cases in which both parents were carriers for the same recessive disease; this led to one finding in ATP7B. Four participants had two findings (one carrier and one non-carrier variant). In total, 71 of the 789 enrolled parents (9.0%) received secondary findings.\n\nCONCLUSIONWe provide an overview of the rates and types of clinically relevant secondary findings, which may be useful in the design, and implementation of research and clinical sequencing efforts to identify such findings.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 36
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Field percentile
- top 8%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genomic diagnosis for children with intellectual disability and/or developmental delay
Kevin M. Bowling, Michelle L. Thompson, … Gregory M. Cooper·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 17, 2017
- Genomic profiling of 553 uncharacterized neurodevelopment patients reveals a high proportion of recessive pathogenic variant carriers in an outbred population
Youngha Lee, Soojin Park, … Jong‐Hee Chae·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 29, 2020
- Pooled-parent exome sequencing to prioritise de novo variants in genetic disease
Harriet Dashnow, Katrina M. Bell, … Alicia Oshlack·bioRxiv·Apr 7, 2019
- Rare variants in the genetic background modulate the expressivity of neurodevelopmental disorders
Lucilla Pizzo, Matthew Jensen, … Santhosh Girirajan·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Sep 5, 2018
- Genome sequencing boosts diagnostic yield for the developmental and epileptic encephalopathies
Jacob E. Munro, Harshini Thiyagarajah, … Michael S. Hildebrand·medRxiv·Apr 28, 2026
- Quantifying the contribution of recessive coding variation to developmental disorders
Hilary C. Martin, Wendy D. Jones, … on behalf of the Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study·SciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2018