PsychopharmacologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Amphetamine alters an EEG marker of reward processing in humans and mice
James F. CavanaghiD, Sarah L. OlguiniD, Jo TalledoiD, Juliana E. Kotz, Benjamin Z. RobertsiD, John A. Nungaray, Joyce SprockiD, David Gregg, Savita G. BhaktaiD, Gregory A. LightiD, Neal R. SwerdlowiD, Jared W. YoungiD, Jonathan L. BrigmaniD
Abstract
The bench-to-bedside development of pro-cognitive therapeutics for psychiatric disorders has been mired by translational failures. This is in part due to the absence of pharmacologically-sensitive cognitive biomarkers common to humans and rodents. Here, we describe a cross-species translational marker of reward processing that is sensitive to the dopamine agonist, d-amphetamine. Motivated by human electroencephalographic (EEG) findings, we recently reported that frontal midline delta-band power is also an electrophysiological biomarker of reward surprise in mice. In the current series of experiments, we determined the impact of parametric doses of d-amphetamine on this reward-related EEG response from humans (n=23) and mice (n=28) performing a probabilistic learning task. In humans, d-amphetamine (placebo, 10 mg, 20 mg) boosted the Reward Positivity event-related potential (ERP) component as well as the spectral delta-band representations of this signal. In mice, d-amphetamine (placebo, 0.1 mg/kg, 0.3 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg) boosted both reward and punishment ERP features, yet there was no modulation of spectral activities. In sum, the present results confirm the role of dopamine in the generation of the Reward Positivity in humans, and paves the way towards a pharmacologically valid biomarker of reward sensitivity across species.
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 34
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The priming effect of rewarding brain stimulation in rats depends on both the cost and strength of reward but survives blockade of D2-like dopamine receptors
Czarina Evangelista, Norhan Mehrez, … Peter Shizgal·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 26, 2023
- The Neural Correlates of Continuous Feedback Processing
Cameron Dale Hassall, Yan Yan, Laurence Tudor Hunt·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 24, 2023
- Dopamine and serotonin differentially associated with reward and punishment processes in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Anahit Mkrtchian, Zeguo Qiu, … Quentin J. M. Huys·bioRxiv·Jan 8, 2025
- Effects of dopamine receptor antagonism and amphetamine-induced psychomotor sensitization on sign- and goal-tracking after extended training
Shaun Yon‐Seng Khoo, Alexandra Uhrig, … Nadia Chaudhri·Behavioural Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2021
- Reward positivity biases interval production in a continuous timing task
Yan Yan, Laurence Tudor Hunt, Cameron Dale Hassall·bioRxiv·Jul 6, 2023
- Dynamics of dopamine transients in human olfactory epithelium during reward learning
Lester P. Sands, Seth R. Batten, … Read Montague·bioRxiv·Oct 15, 2026