Can genetic polymorphisms predict response variability to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex?
Michael PellegriniiD, Maryam ZoghiiD, Shapour J. JaberzadehiD
Abstract
Genetic mediation of cortical plasticity and the role genetic variants play in previously observed response variability to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have become important issues in the tDCS literature in recent years. This study investigated whether inter-individual variability to tDCS was in-part genetically mediated. In sixty-one healthy males, anodal-tDCS (a-tDCS) and sham-tDCS were administered to the primary motor cortex at 1mA for 10-minutes via 6x4cm active and 7x5cm return electrodes. Twenty-five single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded to represent corticospinal excitability (CSE). Twenty-five paired-pulse MEPs were recorded with 3ms inter-stimulus interval (ISI) to assess intracortical inhibition (ICI) via short-interval intracranial inhibition (SICI) and 10ms ISI for intracortical facilitation (ICF). Saliva samples tested for specific genetic polymorphisms in genes encoding for excitatory and inhibitory neuroreceptors. Individuals were sub-grouped based on a pre-determined threshold and via statistical cluster analysis. Two distinct subgroups were identified, increases in CSE following a-tDCS (i.e. Responders) and no increase or even reductions in CSE (i.e. Non-responders). No changes in ICI or ICF were reported. No relationships were reported between genetic polymorphisms in excitatory receptor genes and a-tDCS responders. An association was reported between a-tDCS responders and GABRA3 gene polymorphisms encoding for GABA-A receptors suggesting potential relationships between GABA-A receptor variations and capacity to undergo tDCS-induced cortical plasticity. In the largest tDCS study of its kind, this study presents an important step forward in determining the contribution genetic factors play in previously observed inter-individual variability to tDCS.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 13
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Field percentile
- top 29%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genetic polymorphisms do not predict inter-individual variability to cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex
Michael Pellegrini, Maryam Zoghi, Shapour J. Jaberzadeh·Brain ConnectivityPeer-reviewed·Nov 17, 2020
- The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal and cortico-cortical excitability and response variability: conventional versus high definition montages
Michael Pellegrini, Maryam Zoghi, Shapour J. Jaberzadeh·Neuroscience ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 28, 2020
- Electric field dependent effects of motor cortical TDCS
Ilkka Laakso, Marko Mikkonen, … Satoshi Tanaka·bioRxiv·May 21, 2018
- tDCS induced GABA change is associated with the simulated electric field in M1, an effect mediated by grey matter volume in the MRS voxel
Tulika Nandi, Oula Puonti, … Charlotte Jane Stagg·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Aug 18, 2022
- Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on GABA and Glutamate in Children: A Pilot Study
Chidera Nwaroh, Adrianna Giuffre, … Ashley D. Harris·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jan 7, 2020
- State-dependent effectiveness of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on cortical excitability
Alessandra Vergallito, Erica Varoli, … Leonor J. Romero Lauro·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 20, 2023