Genome biologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Distinguishing biological from technical sources of variation by leveraging multiple methylation datasets
Michael James ThompsoniD, Zeyuan Johnson CheniD, Elior RahmaniiD, Eran HalperiniD
Abstract
DNA methylation remains one of the most widely studied epigenetic markers. One of the major challenges in population studies of methylation is the presence of global methylation effects that may mask local signals. Such global effects may be due to either technical effects (e.g., batch effects) or biological effects (e.g., cell-type composition, genetics). Many methods have been developed for the detection of such global effects, typically in the context of epigenome-wide association studies. However, current unsupervised methods do not distinguish between biological and technical effects, resulting in a loss of highly relevant information. Though supervised methods can be used to estimate known biological effects, it remains difficult to identify and estimate unknown biological effects that globally affect the methylome. Here, we propose CONFINED, a reference-free method based on sparse canonical correlation analysis that captures replicable sources of variation--such as age, sex, and cell-type composition--across multiple methylation datasets and distinguishes them from dataset-specific sources of variability (e.g., technical effects). Consequently, we demonstrate through simulated and real data that by leveraging multiple datasets simultaneously, our approach captures several replicable sources of biological variation better than previous reference-free methods and is considerably more robust to technical noise than previous reference-free methods. CONFINED is available as an R package as detailed at https://github.com/cozygene/CONFINED.
- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Field percentile
- top 48%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- ComBat-met: Adjusting Batch Effects in DNA Methylation Data
Junmin Wang·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 29, 2025
- Reference-free deconvolution of DNA methylation data and mediation by cell composition effects
Eugene Andres Houseman, Molly L Kile, … Carmen J Marsit·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2016
- Technology-independent estimation of cell type composition using differentially methylated regions
Stephanie C. Hicks, Rafael A. Irizarry·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2017
- DiffVar: A new method for detecting differential variability with application to methylation in cancer and aging
Belinda Phipson, Alicia Oshlack·Genome BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 23, 2014
- Accurate prediction of cell composition, age, smoking consumption and infection serostatus based on blood DNA methylation profiles
Jacob Bergstedt, Alejandra Urrutia, … Étienne Patin·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2018
- ReMeDy: A Flexible Statistical Framework For Region-based Detection of DNA Methylation Dysregulation
Suvo Chatterjee, Siddhant Sunil Meshram, … Arindam Fadikar·Statistics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2026