Category-based attention facilitates memory search
Linlin ShangiD, Lu-Chun YehiD, Yuanfang ZhaoiD, Iris WiegandiD, Marius V. PeeleniD
Abstract
We often need to decide whether the object we look at is also the object we look for. When we look for one specific object, this process can be facilitated by preparatory feature-based attention. However, when we look for multiple objects at the same time (e.g., the products on our shopping list) such a strategy may no longer be possible, as research has shown that we can actively prepare to detect only one object at a time. Therefore, looking for multiple objects may additionally involve search in long-term memory, slowing down decision making. Interestingly, however, previous research has shown that memory search can be very efficient when distractor objects are from a different category than the items in the memory set. Here, using EEG, we show that this efficiency is supported by top-down attention at the category level. In Experiment 1, human participants (both sexes) performed a memory search task on individually presented objects of the same or different category as the objects in the memory set. We observed category-level attentional modulation of distractor processing from [~]150 ms after stimulus onset, expressed both as an evoked response modulation and as an increase in decoding accuracy of same-category distractors. In Experiment 2, memory search was performed on two concurrently presented objects. When both objects were distractors, spatial attention (indexed by the N2pc component) was directed to the object that was of the same category as the objects in the memory set. Together, these results demonstrate how attention can facilitate memory search. Significance statementWhen we are in the supermarket, we repeatedly decide whether a product we look at (e.g., a banana) is on our memorized shopping list (e.g., apples, oranges, kiwis). This requires searching our memory, which takes time. However, when the product is of an entirely different category (e.g., dairy instead of fruit), the decision can be made quickly. Here, we used EEG to show that this between-category advantage in memory search tasks is supported by top-down attentional modulation of visual processing: The visual response evoked by distractor objects was modulated by category membership, and spatial attention was quickly directed to the location of within-category (vs. between-category) distractors. These results demonstrate a close link between attention and memory.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Field percentile
- top 31%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The time course of categorical and perceptual similarity effects in visual search
Lu-Chun Yeh, Marius V. Peelen·Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformancePeer-reviewed·Aug 11, 2022
- Unpacking similarity effects in visual memory search: categorical, semantic, and visual contributions
Linlin Shang, Lu-Chun Yeh, … Marius V. Peelen·Journal of Memory and LanguagePeer-reviewed·Nov 9, 2025
- Spatial attention follows category-based attention during naturalistic visual search: evidence from MEG decoding
Elisa Battistoni, DANIEL H. KAISER, … Marius V. Peelen·bioRxiv·Aug 14, 2018
- Electrophysiological correlates of visual memory search
Lauren H. Williams, Iris Wiegand, … Trafton W. Drew·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2024
- Contextual associations of real-world objects guide attention in visual search
Lu-Chun Yeh, Belma Seferovic, … DANIEL H. KAISER·bioRxiv·Jun 29, 2026
- Working memory availability affects neural indices of distractor processing during visual search
Dion Henare, Jude Buckley, Paul Michael Corballis·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2018