Physiotherapist and Podiatrist Independent Prescribing in the United Kingdom: A quasi experimental study
N. Carey, J. Edwards, S. Otter, H. Gage, P. Williams, M. Courtenay, A. Moore, K. Stenner
Abstract
BackgroundIncreasing numbers of nurses, pharmacists and allied health professionals across the world have prescribing rights: over 90,000 of the eligible United Kingdom workforce are qualified as non-doctor prescribers. In order to inform future developments, it is important to understand the benefits and impact of prescribing by allied health professionals including physiotherapists and podiatrists. Aim: to compare outcomes of Physiotherapist and Podiatrist Independent Prescriber (PP-IP) patients with those of Physiotherapist and Podiatrist non-prescribers (PP-NPs). Outcome measures included patient satisfaction, ease of access to services, quality of life and cost implications. Design: a quasi-experimental, post-test control group design Methods: Using mixed methods outcomes were compared between 7 sites where care was provided from a PP-IP (3 podiatrist and 4 physiotherapist IPs) and 7 sites from a PP-NP (3 podiatrist and 4 physiotherapist NPs). Patients were followed up for 2 months (2015-2016). Results: 489 patients were recruited: n=243 IP sites, and n=246 NP sites. Independent prescribing was found to be highly acceptable, and equivalent in terms of quality of life (p>0.05) and patient satisfaction (p[≤]0.05) compared to care provided by NPs. PP-IP care delivery was found to be more resource intensive than NP-PP, with longer consultation duration for IPs (around 6.5 mins), and a higher proportion of physiotherapy patients discussed with medical colleagues (around 9.5 minutes). ConclusionThis study provides new knowledge that PP-IPs provide high levels of care. PP-IP care delivery was found to be more resource intensive. Further research is required to explore cost effectiveness. A more focussed exploration within each profession using targeted outcome measures would enable a more robust comparison, inform future developments around the world and help ensure non-doctor prescribing is recognised as an effective way to alleviate shortfalls in the global workforce.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Physiotherapists perceptions on informed consent and role in the healthcare system, in Europe
N. Roman, S. Caloian, … L. Rogozea·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2019
- Non-medical prescribing policy in the United Kingdom National Health Service: systematic review and narrative synthesis
E. Graham-Clarke, A. Rushton, … J. Marriott·bioRxiv·Mar 20, 2019
- Knowledge And Attitude Towards Palliative Care Among Clinical Undergraduate Students Of Physiotherapy In Nigerian Universities: A Cross-Sectional Study
M. O. Odetunde, J. C. Nwankwo, … A. M. Okonji·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2022
- Task sharing clubfoot treatment in Latin America: a cross-sectional survey of expert opinions
Roxana Martinez, Tracey Smythe, … Joshua E. Hyman·bioRxiv·Sep 2, 2019
- Tasks and responsibilities in physical activity promotion of older patients during hospitalization: A nurse perspective
K. Scheerman, J. W. Mesters, … A. B. Maier·bioRxiv·Nov 29, 2018
- Perspectives of pharmacy employees on an inappropriate use of antimicrobials in Kathmandu, Nepal
N. Shrestha, S. MANANDHAR, … A. Karkey·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2022