Antagonistic kinesin-14s within a single chromosomal drive haplotype

Abstract

In maize, there are two meiotic drive systems that operate on large tandem repeat arrays called knobs that are found on chromosome arms. One meiotic drive haplotype, Abnormal chromosome 10 (Ab10), encodes two kinesin proteins that interact with two distinct tandem repeat arrays in a sequence-specific manner to confer meiotic drive. The kinesin KINDR associates with knob180 repeats while the kinesin TRKIN associates with TR-1 repeats. Prior data show that meiotic drive is conferred primarily by the KINDR/knob180 system, with the TRKIN/TR-1 system having little or no role. The second meiotic drive haplotype, K10L2, shows low levels of meiotic drive and only encodes the TRKIN/TR-1 system. Here we used long-read sequencing to assemble the K10L2 haplotype and showed that it has strong homology to an internal portion of the Ab10 haplotype. We also carried out CRISPR mutagenesis of Trkin to test the role of Trkin on Ab10 and K10L2. The data indicate that the Trkin gene on Ab10 does not improve drive or fitness but instead has a weak deleterious effect when paired with a normal chromosome 10. The deleterious effect is more severe when Ab10 is paired with K10L2: in this context functional Trkin on either chromosome nearly abolishes Ab10 drive. We modeled the effect of Trkin on Ab10 and found it should not persist in the population. We conclude that Trkin either confers an advantage to Ab10 in untested circumstances or that it is in the process of being purged from the Ab10 population. ARTICLE SUMMARYMendels first law states that paired chromosomes are transmitted through meiosis at equal frequencies. Some chromosome variants, however, are transmitted at higher frequencies in a process called meiotic drive. We wanted to know the function of a motor protein called TRKIN that is encoded on a maize meiotic drive chromosome. Surprisingly, we found that TRKIN provides no advantage to the meiotic driver and instead seems to be deleterious, suggesting it had a function in a wild ancestor but is now being purged from the population. The results illustrate how genomes are shaped by often-conflicting forces of selection and selfish genetic elements.