Changes in body size with age do not follow the temperature-size rule
Jennifer S. BigmaniD, Lewis A. K. BarnettiD, James T. ThorsoniD, Sean C. AndersoniD, Krista B. OkeiD, Kelly A. KearneyiD, Darren J. PilcheriD, Wei Cheng, Esther D. GoldsteiniD, Mary Elizabeth MattaiD, Kirstin K. HolsmaniD, Lauren A. RogersiD
Abstract
The temperature size-rule is often described as a reduction in ectothermic body size with warming. This coincides with the expectation that faster growth under warming would lead to larger sizes early in life but smaller sizes later in life. Here, we use > 99,000 observations of weight-at-age of four commercially-important fishes over 25 years to ask whether changes in size and growth can be explained by temperature. We also examine whether oxygen, a key part of a proposed mechanism behind the temperature size-rule, explains patterns of weight-at-age better than temperature. Changes in weight-at-age over time were more related to temperature than oxygen but the effect of temperature on weight was small and did not vary by age, counter to the temperature size-rule. Importantly, these results were sensitive to how the relationship between weight-at-age and temperature was modeled. While the functional form (linear or polynomial) mattered little, how space was included in the model led to different conclusions regarding how temperature affects size and growth. Assuming that spatial and spatiotemporal random effects - those that account for the higher degree of similarity between observations collected closer in space and time - are shared across ages led to different results compared to allowing these effects to vary by age. Models with shared effects suggested weight for younger ages had positive relationships with temperature and negative relationships for older ages. However, these models provided spurious support for the temperature size-rule as they had less statistical support than models that allowed spatial effects to vary by age. Overall, our work highlights that relationships among size, growth, temperature, and oxygen may not be as straightforward as theory suggests and illustrates that modeling decisions can have a large effect on tests of ecological theory, and more broadly, our ability to understand biological responses to climate change.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 0th percentile
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Optimum growth temperature declines with body size within fish species
M. Lindmark, J. Ohlberger, A. Gardmark·bioRxiv·Jan 21, 2021
- Larger but younger fish when growth outpaces mortality in heated ecosystem
M. Lindmark, M. Karlsson, A. Gardmark·eLifePeer-reviewed·May 9, 2023
- Temperature impacts on fish physiology and resource abundance lead to faster growth but smaller fish sizes and yields under warming
M. Lindmark, A. Audzijonyte, … A. Gardmark·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2021
- Size-dependence of food intake and mortality interact with temperature and seasonality to drive diversity in fish life histories
H. K. Kindsvater, M. J. Juan Jorda, … M. Mangel·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2022
- Stronger effect of temperature on body growth in cool than in warm populations suggests lack of local adaptation
M. Lindmark, J. Ohlberger, A. Gardmark·bioRxiv·Jan 17, 2024
- Reduced size of larvae and small fish linked to warming and reduced prey density
Max Lindmark, Malin Werner, … Philip Jacobson·EcographyPeer-reviewed·Oct 9, 2026