A Comparison of Deep Learning Architectures for Inferring Parameters of Diversification Models from Extant Phylogenies
Abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWTo infer the processes that gave rise to past speciation and extinction rates across taxa, space and time, we often formulate hypotheses in the form of stochastic diversification models and estimate their parameters from extant phylogenies using Maximum Likelihood or Bayesian inference. Unfortunately, however, likelihoods can easily become intractable, limiting our ability to consider more complicated diversification processes. Recently, it has been proposed that deep learning (DL) could be used in this case as a likelihood-free inference technique. Here, we explore this idea in more detail, with a particular focus on understanding the ideal network architecture and data representation for using DL in phylogenetic inference. We evaluate the performance of different neural network architectures (DNN, CNN, RNN, GNN) and phylogeny representations (summary statistics, Lineage Through Time or LTT, phylogeny encoding and phylogeny graph) for inferring rates of the Constant Rate Birth-Death (CRBD) and the Binary State Speciation and Extinction (BISSE) models. We find that deep learning methods can reach similar or even higher accuracy than Maximum Likelihood Estimation, provided that network architectures and phylogeny representations are appropriately tuned to the respective model. For example, for the CRBD model we find that CNNs and RNNs fed with LTTs outperform other combinations of network architecture and phylogeny representation, presumably because the LTT is a sufficient and therefore less redundant statistic for homogenous BD models. For the more complex BiSSE model, however, it was necessary to feed the network with both topology and tip states information to reach acceptable performance. Overall, our results suggest that deep learning provides a promising alternative for phylogenetic inference, but that data representation and architecture have strong effects on the inferential performance.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Deep Learning from Phylogenies for Diversification Analyses
S. Lambert, J. Voznica, H. Morlon·bioRxiv·Sep 27, 2022
- On the utility of Deep Learning for model classification and parameter estimation on complex diversification scenarios.
Pablo Gutiérrez de la Peña, Guillermo Iglesias, … Isabel Sanmartín·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2025
- Performance and Robustness of Parameter Estimation from Phylogenetic Trees Using Neural Networks
Tianjian Qin, Koen J. van Benthem, … Rampal S. Etienne·Systematic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2025
- PhyloCNN: Improving tree representation and neural network architecture for deep learning from trees in phylodynamics and diversification studies
Manolo F. Perez, Olivier Gascuel·Systematic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 22, 2025
- Graph Neural Networks for Likelihood-Free Inference in Diversification Models
Amélie Leroy, Ismaël Lajaaiti, … Laurent Jacob·bioRxiv·Aug 14, 2025
- Accurate and efficient phylogenetic inference through end-to-end deep learning
Xinru Zhang, Shizhe Ding, … Dongbo Bu·Molecular Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Oct 23, 2025