On the utility of Deep Learning for model classification and parameter estimation on complex diversification scenarios.
Pablo Gutiérrez de la PeñaiD, Guillermo IglesiasiD, Edgar TalaveraiD, Andrea S. MesegueriD, Isabel SanmartíniD
Abstract
Birth-Death models applied to dated phylogenies are a useful tool to study past diversification dynamics. Parameters in these stochastic models are typically inferred using likelihood-based methods such as Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) or Bayesian Inference. However, these approaches exhibit computational tractability issues in the case of models of moderate to high complexity. One approach to increase model complexity while remaining computationally tractable in the context of birth-death modelling is machine learning. So far, these techniques have been explored in the context of serially-sampled phylogenies (phylodynamics) and trait-dependent birth-death models. Here, we explored the power of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), a type of Deep Learning (DL) method, to solve classification and regression (parameter estimation) tasks under constant-rate and time-homogeneous, rate-variable birth-death models. In particular, we compared six diversification scenarios: Constant Birth-Death, High-Extinction, Mass-Extinction, Diversity-Dependent, Stasis-and-Radiate, and Waxing-and-Waning. We simulated 10, 000 phylogenetic trees under each diversification scenario, which were encoded using a vectorization procedure that captures the topology and branch length information. The encoded trees were used to train or test a set of CNNs models that were designed to tailor three empirical case studies differing in the number of tips. We compared CNNs performance with MLE inference. Our results show that CNNs exhibited classification accuracy levels of 93-78%, whereas maximum likelihood estimation achieved levels of 74-70%. The most difficult scenarios to predict for the CNNs were the high-extinction and mass-extinction scenarios, which were often misidentified as one another. For the regression tasks, mean average errors were comparable between CNNs models and MLE inference, and they also coincided in their difficulty estimating ratio parameters such as mass extinction survival and turnover. Finally, we applied our CNNs to three empirical studies (eucalypts, conifers and cetaceans) and discussed potential shortcomings and future avenues for improvement in the application of deep-learning birth-death modelling approaches.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Comparison of Deep Learning Architectures for Inferring Parameters of Diversification Models from Extant Phylogenies
I. Lajaaiti, S. Lambert, … F. Hartig·bioRxiv·Mar 3, 2023
- Deep Learning from Phylogenies for Diversification Analyses
S. Lambert, J. Voznica, H. Morlon·bioRxiv·Sep 27, 2022
- PhyloCNN: Improving tree representation and neural network architecture for deep learning from trees in phylodynamics and diversification studies
Manolo F. Perez, Olivier Gascuel·Systematic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 22, 2025
- Performance and Robustness of Parameter Estimation from Phylogenetic Trees Using Neural Networks
Tianjian Qin, Koen J. van Benthem, … Rampal S. Etienne·Systematic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2025
- Graph Neural Networks for Likelihood-Free Inference in Diversification Models
Amélie Leroy, Ismaël Lajaaiti, … Laurent Jacob·bioRxiv·Aug 14, 2025
- Phylogeographic model selection using convolutional neural networks
E. Masiero da Fonseca, G. Rinaldi Colli, … B. C. Carstens·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2020