European Journal of NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Selecting stimulation intensity in repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation studies: A systematic review between 1991 and 2020
Zsolt TuriiD, Maximilian LenziD, Walter PaulusiD, Matthias MittneriD, Andreas VlachosiD
Abstract
BackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an increasingly used, non-invasive brain stimulation technique in neuroscience research and clinical practice with a broad spectrum of suggested applications. Among other parameters, the choice of stimulus intensity and intracranial electric field strength substantially impact rTMS outcome. This review provides a systematic overview of the intensity selection approaches and stimulation intensities used in human rTMS studies. We also examined whether studies report sufficient information to reproduce stimulus intensities in basic science research models. Methods. We performed a systematic review by focusing on original studies published between 1991 and 2020. We included conventional (e.g., 1 Hz or 10 Hz) and patterned protocols (e.g., continuous or intermittent theta burst stimulation). We identified 3,784 articles in total, and we manually processed a representative portion (20%) of randomly selected articles. Results. The majority of the analyzed studies (90% of entries) used the motor threshold (MT) approach and stimulation intensities from 80 to 120% of the MT. For continuous and intermittent theta burst stimulation, the most frequent stimulation intensity was 80% of the active MT. Most studies (92% of entries) did not report sufficient information to reproduce the stimulation intensity. Only a minority of studies (1.03% of entries) estimated the rTMS-induced electric field strengths. Conclusion. We formulate easy-to-follow recommendations to help scientists and clinicians report relevant information on stimulation intensity. Future standardized reporting guidelines may facilitate the use of basic science approaches aiming at better understanding the molecular, cellular, and neuronal mechanisms of rTMS.
- Citations
- 85
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Field percentile
- top 20%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- 'RMT-Finder': an automated procedure to determine the Resting Motor Threshold for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Laurine Boidequin, Marcos Moreno Verdú, … Robert M. Hardwick·Journal of Neuroscience MethodsPeer-reviewed·May 2, 2026
- Axon morphology and intrinsic cellular properties determine repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation threshold for plasticity
Christos Galanis, Lena Neuhaus, … Andreas Vlachos·Frontiers in Cellular NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 3, 2024
- Comparing electromyography, accelerometry, and visual inspection to assess the resting motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation
Gautier Hamoline, Antoine E Lunardi, … Robert M. Hardwick·Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewed·Jan 5, 2026
- Development and Validation of the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reporting Assessment Tool(TMS-RAT)
Orsolya Székely, Nicholas P. Holmes, … Luigi Tamè·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Jul 11, 2026
- Matching Corticospinal and Cortical Excitability along the motor cortex: TMS-EMG-EEG study
Maria Nazarova, Macey Higdon, … Hanna Renvall·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2026
- Excess significance bias in repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation literature for neuropsychiatric disorders