bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Matching Corticospinal and Cortical Excitability along the motor cortex: TMS-EMG-EEG study
Maria NazarovaiD, Macey HigdoniD, Joel RousteiD, Tuomas P. MutaneniD, Vadim NikuliniD, Elena UkharovaiD, Selja VaaltoiD, Risto J. IlmoniemiiD, Pantelis LioumisiD, Hanna RenvalliD
Abstract
There is still no consensus on how to choose intensities for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The resting motor threshold (RMT), the intensity needed to evoke muscle contractions in the contralateral limb muscles, is a robust muscle-specific index of corticospinal excitability. RMT from one of the hand muscles is commonly used as a reference for TMS neuromodulation interventions and TMS-electroencephalography (EEG) studies. However, it only provides an indirect measure of cortical excitability, and even for the primary motor cortex (M1), we do not understand how cortical and corticospinal excitability correspond to each other. Indeed, it remains unclear whether cortical responses to TMS follow similar location-dependent patterns along the M1, and whether subthreshold stimulation can reliably engage cortical circuits relevant to motor output. Combining TMS with electromyography (EMG) and EEG, TMS-EMG-EEG, enables simultaneous assessment of corticospinal and cortical excitability to answer these questions. We investigated how cortical excitability thresholds (CETs, measured with EEG), relate to corticospinal excitability thresholds (RMTs, measured with EMG) at the hand, arm, and leg hotspots along the M1 in 24 subjects. RMTs and CETs were strongly correlated, and both increased from hand to arm to leg. CETs were generally lower than RMTs, indicating that subthreshold stimulation was enough to evoke robust early TMS evoked potentials (TEPs). Within subjects, CETs differed from the corresponding RMTs at all three M1 hotspots, and this difference increased from hand to leg representations. The findings of the present study argue against using a default hand-muscle RMT to set cortical excitability dosage along the M1 and beyond. Online TMS-EEG can enable real-time dosing and could improve stimulation precision, efficiency, and generalizability, but the site-specific variability calls for adaptive control.
- organism: human
- assay: electrophysiology
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Inhibiting corticospinal excitability by entraining ongoing mu-alpha rhythm in motor cortex
E. A. Zmeykina, Zsolt Turi, … Walter Paulus·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2020
- Not two sides of the same coin: Divergent effects of motor state on corticospinal and cortical responses to TMS of motor cortex
Mikkel Malling Beck, Lasse Christiansen, … Hartwig Roman Siebner·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2025
- The correspondence between EMG and EEG measures of changes in cortical excitability following transcranial magnetic stimulation
Mana Biabani, Alex Fornito, … Nigel C. Rogasch·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2021
- EEG-triggered TMS reveals stronger brain state-dependent modulation of motor evoked potentials at weaker stimulation intensities
Natalie Schaworonkow, Jochen Triesch, … Christoph Zrenner·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2018
- Phosphene and Motor Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Thresholds Are Correlated: A Meta-Analytic Investigation
Phivos Phylactou, Thu N. Pham, … Siobhan M. Schabrun·Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Apr 29, 2024
- Immediate TMS-EEG responses reveal motor cortex excitability
Antonietta Stango, Agnese Zazio, … Marta Bortoletto·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 19, 2025