Journal of Medical GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
ATR16 Syndrome: Mechanisms Linking Monosomy to Phenotype
Christian BabbsiD, Jill M. BrowniD, Sharon W. Horsley, Joanne Slater, Evie MaifoshieiD, Shiwangini Kumar, Paul Ooijevaar, Marjolein Kriek, Amanda Dixon‐McIver, Cornelis L. HarteveldiD, Jan Traeger-Synodinos, Andrew O.M. WilkieiD, Douglas R. HiggsiD, Veronica J. BuckleiD
Abstract
BackgroundSporadic deletions removing 100s-1000s kb of DNA, and variable numbers of poorly characterised genes, are often found in patients with a wide range of developmental abnormalities. In such cases, understanding the contribution of the deletion to an individuals clinical phenotype is challenging.\n\nMethodsHere, as an example of this common phenomenon, we analysed 34 patients with simple deletions of [~]177 to [~]2000 kb affecting one allele of the well characterised, gene dense, distal region of chromosome 16 (16p13.3), referred to as ATR-16 syndrome. We characterised precise deletion extent and screened for genetic background effects, telomere position effect and compensatory up regulation of hemizygous genes.\n\nResultsWe find the risk of developmental and neurological abnormalities arises from much smaller terminal chromosome 16 deletions ([~]400 kb) than previously reported. Beyond this, the severity of ATR-16 syndrome increases with deletion size, but there is no evidence that critical regions determine the developmental abnormalities associated with this disorder. Surprisingly, we find no evidence of telomere position effect or compensatory upregulation of hemizygous genes, however, genetic background effects substantially modify phenotypic abnormalities.\n\nConclusionsUsing ATR-16 as a general model of disorders caused by sporadic copy number variations, we show the degree to which individuals with contiguous gene syndromes are affected is not simply related to the number of genes deleted but also depends on their genetic background. We also show there is no critical region defining the degree of phenotypic abnormalities in ATR-16 syndrome and this has important implications for genetic counselling.
- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Field percentile
- top 30%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Rare variants in the genetic background modulate the expressivity of neurodevelopmental disorders
Lucilla Pizzo, Matthew Jensen, … Santhosh Girirajan·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Sep 5, 2018
- Combinatorial patterns of gene expression changes contribute to variable expressivity of the developmental delay-associated 16p12.1 deletion
Matthew Jensen, Anastasia Tyryshkina, … Santhosh Girirajan·bioRxiv·Mar 6, 2021
- A new mouse model of ATR-X syndrome carrying a common patient mutation exhibits neurological and morphological defects
Rebekah Tillotson, Keqin Yan, … Monica J. Justice·Human Molecular GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 12, 2023
- Oligogenic effects of 16p11.2 copy number variation on craniofacial development
Yuqi Qiu, Thomas Arbogast, … Jonathan L. Sebat·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2019
- Pervasive epistasis modulates neurodevelopmental defects of the autism-associated 16p11.2 deletion
Janani S. Iyer, Mayanglambam Dhruba Singh, … Santhosh Girirajan·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2018
- Y chromosome damage underlies testicular abnormalities in ATR-X syndrome
Nayla Yazmin Leon Carlos, Thanh Nha Uyen Le, … Vincent R. Harley·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2023