Cell ReportsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Oligogenic effects of 16p11.2 copy number variation on craniofacial development
Yuqi QiuiD, Thomas Arbogast, Sandra Martín LorenzoiD, Hongying LiiD, Shih C. TangiD, Ellen Richardson, Oanh HongiD, Shawn Cho, Omar ShantaiD, Timothy PangiD, Christina M. CorselloiD, Curtis K. Deutsch, Claire ChevalieriD, Erica E. DavisiD, Lilia M. IakouchevaiD, Yann HéraultiD, Nicholas KatsanisiD, Karen S. MesseriD, Jonathan L. SebatiD
Abstract
A copy number variant (CNV) of 16p11.2, which encompasses 30 genes, is associated with developmental and psychiatric disorders, head size and body mass. The genetic mechanisms that underlie these associations are not understood. To elucidate the effects of genes on development, we exploited the quantitative effects of CNV on craniofacial structure in humans and model organisms. We show that reciprocal deletion and duplication of 16p11.2 have characteristic "mirror" effects on craniofacial features that are conserved in human, rat and mouse. By testing gene dosage effects on the shape of the mandible in zebrafish, we show that the distribution of effects for all individual genes is consistent with that of the CNV, and some combinations have non-additive effects. Our results suggest that, at minimum, one third of genes within the 16p11.2 region influence craniofacial development, and the facial gestalt of each CNV represents a product of 30 dosage effects. HighlightsO_LIReciprocal CNVs of 16p11.2 have mirror effects on craniofacial structure. Copy number is associated with a positive effect on nasal and mandibular regions and a negative effect on frontal regions of the face. C_LIO_LIEffects of CNV on craniofacial development in human are well conserved in rat and mouse models of 16p11.2 deletion and duplication. C_LIO_LI7/30 genes each independently have significant effects on the shape of the mandible in zebrafish; these include SPN, C16orf54, SEZ6L2, ASPHD1, TAOK2, INO80E and FAM57B. Others (MAPK3, MVP, KCTD13) have detectable effects only in combination. C_LIO_LIOverexpression of 30 genes individually showed a distribution of effects that was skewed in the same direction as that of the full duplication, suggesting that specific facial features represent the net of all individual effects combined. C_LI
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- organism: rat
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 56
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- 16p12.1 deletion orthologs are expressed in motile neural crest cells and are important for regulating craniofacial development in Xenopus laevis
Micaela C. Lasser, Jessica Bolduc, … Laura Anne Lowery·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 24, 2022
- Cortical Organoids Model Early Brain Development Disrupted by 16p11.2 Copy Number Variants in Autism
Jorge Urresti, Pan Zhang, … Lilia M. Iakoucheva·Molecular PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Aug 25, 2021
- Copy Number Variation at 16p11.2 Imparts Transcriptional Alterations in Neural Development in an hiPSC-derived Model of Corticogenesis
Julien George Roth, Kristin L. Muench, … Theo D. Palmer·bioRxiv·Apr 22, 2020
- Disruption of fos causes craniofacial anomalies in developing zebrafish
Lorena Maili, Bhavna Tandon, … Jacqueline T. Hecht·Frontiers in Cell and Developmental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 16, 2023
- Patient brain organoids identify a link between the 16p11.2 copy number variant and the RBFOX1 gene.
Milos Kostic, Joseph J. Raymond, … Robert J. Ihry·ACS Chemical NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2023
- Mapping Cerebellar Morphology in 15q11.2 CNV Carriers Using Normative Modeling
Milin Kim, Esten Høyland Leonardsen, … Torgeir Moberget·medRxiv·May 28, 2025