Synergy-informed bilevel optimization reveals joint-specific benefits for realistic exoskeleton torque prediction

Abstract

Simulation-driven optimization can guide exoskeleton control design, but its utility is limited by the accuracy with which muscle coordination is predicted. Strict effort-minimization formulations predict non-physiological muscle shutdown under high exoskeleton assistance, leading to peak assistive torques that exceed values reported in human-in-the-loop experiments. We evaluated the accuracy of synergy-informed simulations at predicting assistance across four single-joint exoskeleton configurations: ankle plantarflexion, knee extension, hip flexion, and hip abduction. We implemented a bilevel optimization to predict a parameterized assistive torque that minimizes metabolic cost, with assisted muscle dynamics estimated via either effort-minimization simulations (minimizing muscle effort only) or synergy-informed simulations (minimizing muscle effort constrained to a synergy structure). We used experimental data from five unimpaired adults walking at their preferred speed and compared results descriptively between the two formulations within each subject. Assistance based on effort-minimization simulations shut down agonist muscle activations and overestimated peak assistive torque compared with experimental values. In contrast, constraining muscle controls to a synergy structure prevented non-physiological muscle shutdown and yielded assistive torques closer to those measured in human-in-the-loop experiments. This benefit was not observed equally across all assisted degrees of freedom or subjects, emerging only where no single synergy could be suppressed to unload the assisted muscles. Synergy weights can therefore be interpreted as joint-specific predictors of when simulations can reliably inform wearable robot design.