bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Generative neural networks separate common and specific transcriptional responses
Alexandra J. LeeiD, Dallas L. MouldiD, Jake CrawfordiD, Dongbo HuiD, Rani K. PowersiD, Georgia DoingiD, James C. CostelloiD, Deborah A. HoganiD, Casey S. GreeneiD
Abstract
Genome-wide transcriptome profiling identifies genes that are prone to differential expression across contexts ("common DEGs"), as well as genes with changes specific to the experimental manipulation. Distinguishing common DEGs from those that are specifically changed in a context of interest allows more efficient prediction of which genes are specific to a given biological process under scrutiny. Currently, commonly differentially expressed genes or pathways can only be identified through the laborious manual curation of highly controlled experiments, an inordinately time-consuming and impractical endeavor. Here we pioneer an approach for identifying common patterns using generative neural networks. This approach produces a background set of transcriptomic experiments from which a null distribution of gene and pathway changes can be generated. By comparing the set of differentially expressed genes found in a target experiment against the generated background set, common results can be easily separated from specific ones. This "Specific cOntext Pattern Highlighting In Expression data" (SOPHIE) approach is broadly applicable to new platforms or any species with a large collection of gene expression data. We apply SOPHIE to diverse datasets including those from human, human cancer, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. SOPHIE identifies common DEGs in concordance with previously described, manually and systematically determined common DEGs. Further, molecular validation indicates that SOPHIE detects highly specific, but low magnitude, biologically relevant, transcriptional changes. SOPHIEs measure of specificity can complement log fold change values generated from traditional differential expression analyses. For example, by filtering the set of differentially expressed genes, one can identify those genes that are specifically relevant to the experimental condition of interest. Consequently, these results can inform future research directions.
- organism: human
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Elucidating gene expression patterns across multiple biological contexts through a large-scale investigation of transcriptomic datasets
Rebeca Queiroz Figueiredo, Sara Díaz del Ser, … Daniel Domingo‐Fernándéz·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 15, 2022
- From system-wide differential gene expression to perturbed regulatory factors: a combinatorial approach
Gaurang Mahajan, Shekhar C Mande·bioRxiv·Jan 15, 2015
- Data-driven detection of subtype-specific and differentially expressed genes
Lulu Chen, Yingzhou Lu, … Yue Wang·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 11, 2021
- Evaluating single-subject study methods for personal transcriptomic interpretations to advance precision medicine
Samir Rachid Zaim, Colleen Kenost, … Yves A. Lussier·BMC Medical GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2019
- DENetwork: Unveiling Regulatory and Signaling Networks Behind Differentially-Expressed Genes
Ting‐Yi Su, Quazi S. Islam, … Jun Ding·bioRxiv·Jun 27, 2023
- Differential Expression Enrichment Tool (DEET): an interactive atlas of human differential gene expression
Dustin Sokolowski, Jedid Ahn, … Michael D. Wilson·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 10, 2023