Computational and Structural Biotechnology ReportsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Generation of appropriate protein structures for virtual screening using AlphaFold3 predicted protein-ligand complexes
Abstract
In early drug discovery, virtual screening--a computational method for selecting candidate compounds--helps reduce development costs. Traditionally, structure-based virtual screening required experimental protein structures, but advances like AlphaFold2 have begun to overcome this limitation. However, AlphaFold2 does not capture ligand-induced conformational changes (transition from apo to holo forms), limiting its utility for protein-ligand docking. In this study, we evaluate AlphaFold3, which predicts protein-ligand complex structures when both protein and ligand inputs are provided. Using the DUD-E dataset and Uni-Dock, we show that holo structures predicted with ligand inclusion yield higher screening performance than apo structures generated without ligand input. Notably, incorporating active ligands enhances screening performance, whereas inactive (decoy) ligands produce results similar to apo predictions. The use of template structures further improves outcomes. We also analyze the impact of ligand molecular weight, binding pocket location, and AlphaFold3 ranking scores on screening performance. Our findings indicate that lower molecular weight ligands tend to generate predicted structures that more closely resemble experimental holo structures, thus improving screening efficacy. Conversely, larger ligands (700-800) can induce open binding pockets that favor screening for some targets. These results suggest that employing AlphaFold3 with appropriate ligand inputs is a promising strategy for virtual screening, particularly for proteins lacking experimental structural data.
- assay: protein structure
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: protein structure prediction
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Field percentile
- top 8%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- AlphaFold3 for Structure-guided Ligand Discovery
Kartikeya M. Menon, Aakash Davasam, … Jiankun Lyu·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2026
- Assessment of AlphaFold structures and optimization methods for virtual screening
Yanfei Peng, Xia Wu, … Ke Hao·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2023
- Are Deep Learning Structural Models Sufficiently Accurate for Virtual Screening? Application of Docking Algorithms to AlphaFold2 Predicted Structures
A. M. Diaz-Rovira, H. Martin, … S. S. Ray·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2022
- Leveraging AlphaFold2 structural space exploration for generating drug target structures in structure-based virtual screening
Keisuke Uchikawa, Kairi Furui, Masahito Ohue·Biochemistry and Biophysics ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2025
- Benchmarking HelixFold3-Predicted Holo Structures for Relative Free Energy Perturbation Calculations
Kairi Furui, Masahito Ohue·ACS OmegaPeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2025
- AlphaFold3 in Drug Discovery: A Comprehensive Assessment of Capabilities, Limitations, and Applications
Haiyang Zheng, Hanfeng Lin, … Jin Wang·bioRxiv·Apr 7, 2025