henhaobio
Sign in

Medical Image AnalysisBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

Deep learning microstructure estimation of developing brains from diffusion MRI: a newborn and fetal study

Hamza KebiriiD, Ali GholipouriD, Rizhong LiniD, Lana VasungiD, Camilo A. CalixtoiD, Željka KrsnikiD, Davood KarimiiD, Meritxell Bach CuadraiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) is widely used to assess the brain white matter. Fiber orientation distribution functions (FODs) are a common way of representing the orientation and density of white matter fibers. However, with standard FOD computation methods, accurate estimation of FODs requires a large number of measurements that usually cannot be acquired for newborns and fetuses. We propose to overcome this limitation by using a deep learning method to map as few as six diffusion-weighted measurements to the target FOD. To train the model, we use the FODs computed using multi-shell high angular resolution measurements as target. Extensive quantitative evaluations show that the new deep learning method, using significantly fewer measurements, achieves comparable or superior results to standard methods such as Constrained Spherical Deconvolution. We demonstrate the generalizability of the new deep learning method across scanners, acquisition protocols, and anatomy on two clinical datasets of newborns and fetuses. Additionally, we compute agreement metrics within the HARDI newborn dataset, and validate fetal FODs with post-mortem histological data. The results of this study show the advantage of deep learning in inferring the microstructure of the developing brain from in-vivo dMRI measurements that are often very limited due to subject motion and limited acquisition times, but also highlight the intrinsic limitations of dMRI in the analysis of the developing brain microstructure. These findings, therefore, advocate for the need for improved methods that are tailored to studying the early development of human brain.

Citations
20
FWCI
3.31
Field percentile
top 7%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.