Experimental Brain ResearchNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Metaplastic neuromodulation via transcranial direct current stimulation has no effect on corticospinal excitability and neuromuscular fatigue
Madison R BodaiD, Lavender A. OtienoiD, Ashleigh E. SmithiD, Mitchell R. GoldsworthyiD, Simranjit K. SidhuiD
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation tool with potential for managing fatigue, possibly due to alterations in corticospinal excitability. However, inconsistencies in intra- and inter-individual variability responsiveness to tDCS limit its clinical use. Emerging evidence suggests harnessing homeostatic metaplasticity induced via tDCS may reduce variability and boost its outcomes, yet little is known regarding its influence on fatigue in healthy adults. We explored whether cathodal tDCS (ctDCS) prior to exercise combined with anodal tDCS (atDCS) could augment corticospinal excitability and attenuate fatigue. 15 young healthy adults (6 males, 22 {+/-} 4 years) participated in four pseudo-randomised neuromodulation sessions: sham stimulation prior and during exercise, sham stimulation prior and atDCS during exercise, ctDCS prior and atDCS during exercise, ctDCS prior and sham stimulation during exercise. The exercise constituted an intermittent maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) for 10 minutes. Fatigue was quantified as an attenuation in MVC force, while motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude provided an assessment of corticospinal excitability. MEP amplitude increased during the fatiguing exercise, whilst across time, force decreased. There were no differences in MEP amplitudes or force between neuromodulation sessions. These outcomes highlight the ambiguity of harnessing metaplasticity to ameliorate fatigue in young healthy individuals.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Field percentile
- top 36%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Priming anodal transcranial direct current stimulation attenuates short interval intracortical inhibition and increases time to task failure of a constant workload cycling exercise
Simranjit K. Sidhu·Experimental Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 23, 2021
- Preconditioning cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates the neuroplastic effect of subsequent anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied during cycling in young adults
Maryam Pourmajidian, Benedikt Lauber, Simranjit K. Sidhu·Neuroscience LettersPeer-reviewed·Nov 2, 2019
- State-dependent effectiveness of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on cortical excitability
Alessandra Vergallito, Erica Varoli, … Leonor J. Romero Lauro·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 20, 2023
- The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal and cortico-cortical excitability and response variability: conventional versus high definition montages
Michael Pellegrini, Maryam Zoghi, Shapour J. Jaberzadeh·Neuroscience ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 28, 2020
- Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation modulates corticospinal excitability while preserving motor unit discharge properties during isometric contractions
J. C. Hernandez-Pavon, S. Avrillon, … J. L. Pons·bioRxiv·Mar 10, 2022
- 1H MR Spectroscopy of the Motor Cortex Immediately following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation at 7 Tesla
K. Ryan, K. Wawrzyn, … R. Bartha·bioRxiv·May 15, 2018