Sign in
BioengineeringPLoS ONE
Peer-reviewed journal article

From Body Hulls to Musculoskeletal Models: Personalized Inertial Parameter Estimation

Markus GambietziD, Putri Qistina Azam, Philipp Amon, Iris WechsleriD, Eva Maria HilleiD, Timo MenzeliD, Tabea Ott, Mario BotschiD, Matthias BrauniD, Jörg MiehlingiD, Katie Louise McMahoniD, Anne D. KoelewijniD

Abstract

Every human body is different, however, current movement analysis does not reflect that, as it heavily relies on generic musculoskeletal models. Usually, these models are scaled to match the participants body segment lengths and body weight, but not taking individual body shape into account. This can lead to errors in the estimation of joint forces and torques, which are important to accurately estimate musculoskeletal variables. Thus, we developed a method to estimate body segment inertial parameters based on body hulls acquired via smartphone pictures. From the body hull, we infer the skeletal shape and pose, and then estimate the distribution of bone, lean, and fatty tissues. We then segment the body hull and assign each tissue type a density, which is used to calculate the body segment inertial parameters. To allow for the use of our method with existing data, we also introduce two new generic musculoskeletal models, which are based on the average standing body shapes. Validation using MRI-derived ground-truth models shows that our method creates participant-specific musculoskeletal models that are closer to the MRI-derived ground truth than scaled generic models. Additionally, we performed lab-based gait experiments to evaluate the effect of our method on residual forces and joint moments, where we found that our method leads to a reduction of residual forces of up to 14.9 % and a reduction of metabolic cost of up to 12.8 % when compared to generic musculoskeletal models. Our new generic models show similar joint moment outcomes, but less reduction of residual forces than the personalized models.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
34th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.