Ear and HearingNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Auditory steady-state responses: multiplexed amplitude modulation frequencies to reduce recording time
Rien SonckiD, Jonas VanthornhoutiD, Estelle BoniniD, Tom FrancartiD
Abstract
ObjectivesThis study investigated the efficiency of a multiplexed amplitude-modulated (AM) stimulus in eliciting auditory steady-state responses (ASSR). The multiplexed AM stimulus was created by simultaneously modulating speech-shaped noise with three frequencies chosen to elicit different neural generators: 3.1, 40.1, and 102.1 Hz. For comparison, a single AM stimulus was created for each of these frequencies, resulting in three single AM conditions and one multiplex AM condition. DesignTwenty-two bilaterally normal-hearing participants (18 female) listened for 8 minutes to each type of stimuli. The analysis compared the signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and amplitudes of the evoked responses to the single and multiplexed conditions. ResultsThe results revealed that the SNRs elicited by single AM conditions were, on average, 1.61 dB higher than those evoked by the multiplexed AM condition (p < 0.05). The single conditions consistently produced a significantly higher SNR when examining various stimulus durations ranging from 1 to 8 minutes. Despite these SNR differences, the frequency spectrum was very similar across and within subjects. Additionally, the sensor space patterns across the scalp demonstrated similar trends between the single and multiplexed stimuli for both SNR and amplitudes. Both the single and multiplexed conditions evoked significant ASSRs within subjects. On average, the multiplexed AM stimulus took 31 minutes for the lower bound of the 95% prediction interval to cross the significance threshold across all three frequencies. In contrast, the single AM stimuli took 45 minutes and 42 seconds. ConclusionThese findings show that the multiplexed AM stimulus is a promising method to reduce the recording time when simultaneously obtaining information from various neural generators.
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.56
- Field percentile
- top 41%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The effect of stimulus envelope shape on the auditory steady-state response
Jana Van Canneyt, Michael Hofmann, … Tom Francart·Hearing ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2019
- Estimation of auditory steady-state responses based on the averaging of independent EEG epochs
Pavel Prado, Eduardo Martínez‐Montes, … Matías Zañartu·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jan 24, 2019
- Improving source modeling of auditory steady-state responses with frequency-specific brain maps
Ehsan Darestani Farahani, Jan M Wouters, Astrid Van Wieringen·bioRxiv·Dec 3, 2019
- Rapid and objective assessment of auditory temporal processing using dynamic amplitude-modulated stimuli
Satyabrata Parida, Kimberly Yurasits, … Aravindakshan Parthasarathy·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 15, 2024
- Attentional Modulation of the Auditory Steady-State Response across the Cortex
Cassia Low Manting, Lau M. Andersen, … Daniel Lundqvist·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·May 15, 2020
- Real-life ear-EEG Recordings of Auditory Responses to Ambient Sounds
Jacopo Comoglio, Bowen Duan, … Preben Kidmose·International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Nov 11, 2025