bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Kun-peng: an ultra-memory-efficient, fast, and accurate pan-domain taxonomic classifier for all
Qiong CheniD, Boliang ZhangiD, Peng CheniD, Jiajun HuangiD, Xiaotao SheniD, Chao JiangiD
Abstract
Comprehensive metagenomic sequence classification of diverse environmental samples faces significant computing memory challenges due to exponentially expanding genome databases. Here, we present Kun-peng, featuring a unique ordered 4GB block database design for ultra-efficient resource management, faster processing, and higher accuracy. When benchmarked on mock communities (Amos HiLo, Mixed, and NIST) against Kraken2, Centrifuge, and Sylph. Kun-peng matched Sylph, achieving the highest precision and lowest false-positive rates while demonstrating superior time and memory efficiency among all tested tools. Furthermore, Kun-pengs efficient database architecture enables the practical utilization of large-scale reference databases that were previously computationally prohibitive. In comprehensive testing across 586 air, water, soil, and human metagenomic samples using an expansive pan-domain database (204,477 genomes, 4.3TB), Kun-peng classified 69.78-94.29% of reads, achieving 38-43% higher classification rates than Kraken2 with the standard database. Unexpectedly, Sylph failed to classify any reads in air samples and left > 99.85% of reads unclassified in water and soil samples. In terms of computational efficiency, Kun-peng processed each sample in 0.2[~]11.2 minutes using only 4.0[~]35.4GB peak memory. Remarkably, these processing times were comparable to Kraken2 using the standard database (81GB, 5% of the pan-domain database). Memory-wise, Kun-peng required only 35.4GB peak memory with the pan-domain database, representing a 473-fold reduction compared to Kraken2. When compared to Sylph, Kun-peng processes samples up to 46.3 times faster while using up to 20.6 times less memory. Overall, Kun-peng offers an ultra-memory-efficient, fast, and accurate solution for pan-domain metagenomic classifications.
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- research focus: sequence-to-function modeling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Metagenomic classification with KrakenUniq on low-memory computers
Christopher Pockrandt, Aleksey V. Zimin, Steven L. Salzberg·The Journal of Open Source SoftwarePeer-reviewed·Dec 28, 2022
- Chimera: Ultrafast and Memory-efficient Database Construction for High-Accuracy Taxonomic Classification in the Age of Expanding Genomic Data
Qinzhong Tian, Pinglu Zhang, … Ximei Luo·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2025
- From defaults to databases: parameter and database choice dramatically impact the performance of metagenomic taxonomic classification tools
Robyn Wright, A. Comeau, Morgan G. I. Langille·Microbial GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Mar 3, 2023
- Run-length compressed metagenomic read classification with SMEM-finding and tagging
Lore Depuydt, Omar Y. Ahmed, … Travis Gagie·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 19, 2025
- Kaiju: Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics
Peter Menzel, Kim Lee Ng, Anders Krogh·bioRxiv·Dec 18, 2015
- Sensitive and scalable metagenomic classification using spaced metamers, reduced alphabets, and syncmers
Jaebeom Kim, Martin Steinegger·bioRxiv·Apr 5, 2026