Longitudinal white matter changes associated with cognitive training
Emily S. NicholsiD, Jonathan Erez, Bobby Boge StojanoskiiD, Kathleen LyonsiD, Suzanne T. WittiD, Charlotte Mace, Sameera KhalidiD, Adrian Mark OweniD
Abstract
Improvements in behaviour are known to be accompanied by both structural and functional changes in the brain. However whether those changes lead to more general improvements, beyond the behaviour being trained, remains a contentious issue. We investigated whether training on one of two cognitive tasks would lead to either near transfer (that is, improvements on a quantifiably similar task) or far transfer (that is, improvements on a quantifiably different task), and furthermore, if such changes did occur, what the underlying neural mechanisms might be. Participants trained on either a verbal inhibitory control task or a visuospatial working memory task for four weeks, over the course of which they received five diffusion tensor imaging scans. Two additional tasks, a test of verbal reasoning and a test of spatial span, served as measures of near transfer for the inhibitory control task and spatial working memory task, respectively. These two tasks also served as measures of far transfer for the alternate training task. Behaviourally, participants improved on the task that they trained on, but did not improve on cognitively similar tests (near transfer), nor cognitively dissimilar tests (far transfer). Extensive changes to white matter microstructure were observed, with verbal inhibitory control training leading to changes in a left-lateralized network of fronto-temporal and occipito-frontal tracts, and visuospatial working memory training leading to changes in right-lateralized fronto-parietal tracts. Very little overlap was observed in changes between the two training groups. On the basis of these results, we suggest that near and far transfer were not observed because the changes in white matter tracts associated with training on each task are almost entirely non-overlapping with, and therefore afford no advantages for, the untrained tasks.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 13
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Field percentile
- top 13%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Newly trained navigation and verbal memory skills elicit changes in task-related networks but not brain structure
Li Juan Zheng, Zachary Boogaart, … Steven Marc Weisberg·bioRxiv·Apr 14, 2025
- Training-induced prefrontal neuronal changes transfer between tasks
Hua Tang, Mitchell R. Riley, … Christos Constantinidis·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2020
- White Matter Brain Structure Predicts Language Performance and Learning Success
Stella M. Sánchez, HELMUT J. SCHMIDT, … Thomas R. Knösche·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2022
- Structural and functional brain changes following four weeks of unimanual motor training: evidence from fMRI-guided diffusion MRI tractography
Lee B. Reid, Martin V. Sale, … Stephen Rose·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jul 5, 2017
- Are working memory training effects paradigm-specific?
Joni Holmes, Francesca Woolgar, … Susan Elizabeth Gathercole·Frontiers in PsychologyPeer-reviewed·May 24, 2019
- Distributional changes in myelin-specific MRI markers uncover dynamics in the fornix following spatial navigation training
Debbie Anaby, Benjamin C. Tendler, … Derek Kenton Jones·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2020