Effects of dopamine and opioid receptor antagonism on the neural processing of social and non-social rewards
Claudia MassaccesiiD, Sebastian KorbiD, Sebastian J. Götzendorfer, Emilio ChiappiniiD, Matthäus WilleitiD, Johan N. LundströmiD, Christian WindischbergeriD, Christoph EiseneggeriD, Giorgia SilaniiD
Abstract
Rewards are a broad category of stimuli inducing approach behavior to aid survival. Extensive evidence from animal research has shown that wanting (the motivation to pursue a reward) and liking (the pleasure associated with its consumption) are mostly regulated by dopaminergic and opioidergic activity in dedicated brain areas. However, less is known about the neuroanatomy of dopaminergic and opioidergic regulation of reward processing in humans, especially when considering different types of rewards (i.e., social and non-social). To fill this gap of knowledge, we combined dopaminergic and opioidergic antagonism (via amisulpride and naltrexone administration) with functional neuroimaging to investigate the neurochemical and neuroanatomical bases of wanting and liking of matched non-social (food) and social (interpersonal touch) rewards, using a randomized, between-subject, placebo-controlled, double-blind design. While at the behavioral level no drug effect was observed, brain activity was modulated by the administered compounds. In particular, opioid antagonism, compared to placebo, was associated with reduced activity in the medial orbitofrontal cortex during consumption of the most valued social and non-social rewards. Dopamine antagonism, however, had no clear effects on brain activity in response to rewards anticipation. These findings provide insights into the neurobiology of human reward processing and suggest a similar opioidergic regulation of the neural responses to social and non-social reward consumption.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Field percentile
- top 10%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Dopaminergic and opioidergic regulation of implicit hedonic facial reactions during anticipation and consumption of social and nonsocial rewards
Sebastian Korb, Sebastian J. Götzendorfer, … Giorgia Silani·bioRxiv·Feb 3, 2020
- Opioid antagonism reduces wanting by strengthening frontostriatal connectivity
Alexander Soutschek, Susanna C. Weber, … Philippe N. Tobler·eLifePeer-reviewed·Nov 11, 2021
- Loss of mu and delta opioid receptors on neurons expressing dopamine receptor D1 has no effect on reward sensitivity
Zofia Harda, Jadwiga Spyrka, … Jan M. Rodriguez Parkitna·NeuropharmacologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2020
- Distinct mechanisms mediate dopamine-octopamine opponency in an insect model of olfaction
Yelyzaveta Bessonova, Ivy Clark, … Baranidharan Raman·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 14, 2026
- Dopamine and serotonin differentially associated with reward and punishment processes in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Anahit Mkrtchian, Zeguo Qiu, … Quentin J. M. Huys·bioRxiv·Jan 8, 2025
- Effects of dopamine D2 and opioid receptor antagonism on the trade-off between model-based and model-free behavior in healthy volunteers
Nace Mikuš, Sebastian Korb, … Christoph D. Mathys·eLifePeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2022