Sign in
NeuroscienceHuman Brain Mapping
Peer-reviewed journal article

Effects of dopamine and opioid receptor antagonism on the neural processing of social and non-social rewards

Claudia MassaccesiiD, Sebastian KorbiD, Sebastian J. Götzendorfer, Emilio ChiappiniiD, Matthäus WilleitiD, Johan N. LundströmiD, Christian WindischbergeriD, Christoph EiseneggeriD, Giorgia SilaniiD

Abstract

Rewards are a broad category of stimuli inducing approach behavior to aid survival. Extensive evidence from animal research has shown that wanting (the motivation to pursue a reward) and liking (the pleasure associated with its consumption) are mostly regulated by dopaminergic and opioidergic activity in dedicated brain areas. However, less is known about the neuroanatomy of dopaminergic and opioidergic regulation of reward processing in humans, especially when considering different types of rewards (i.e., social and non-social). To fill this gap of knowledge, we combined dopaminergic and opioidergic antagonism (via amisulpride and naltrexone administration) with functional neuroimaging to investigate the neurochemical and neuroanatomical bases of wanting and liking of matched non-social (food) and social (interpersonal touch) rewards, using a randomized, between-subject, placebo-controlled, double-blind design. While at the behavioral level no drug effect was observed, brain activity was modulated by the administered compounds. In particular, opioid antagonism, compared to placebo, was associated with reduced activity in the medial orbitofrontal cortex during consumption of the most valued social and non-social rewards. Dopamine antagonism, however, had no clear effects on brain activity in response to rewards anticipation. These findings provide insights into the neurobiology of human reward processing and suggest a similar opioidergic regulation of the neural responses to social and non-social reward consumption.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISKorb '20Soutschek '21Harda '20Bessonova '26Mkrtchian '25Mikuš '22
84% semantic matchNeuroscience
Sebastian Korb, Sebastian J. Götzendorfer, Claudia Massaccesi+5 more·bioRxiv·Feb 3, 2020· 2 citations