MR-Clust: Clustering of genetic variants in Mendelian randomization with similar causal estimates
Christopher N. FoleyiD, Amy M. MasoniD, Paul KirkiD, Stephen BurgessiD
Abstract
MotivationMendelian randomization is an epidemiological technique that uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to estimate the causal effect of a risk factor on an outcome. We consider a scenario in which causal estimates based on each variant in turn differ more strongly than expected by chance alone, but the variants can be divided into distinct clusters, such that all variants in the cluster have similar causal estimates. This scenario is likely to occur when there are several distinct causal mechanisms by which a risk factor influences an outcome with different magnitudes of causal effect. We have developed an algorithm MR-Clust that finds such clusters of variants, and so can identify variants that reflect distinct causal mechanisms. Two features of our clustering algorithm are that it accounts for uncertainty in the causal estimates, and it includes null and junk clusters, to provide protection against the detection of spurious clusters. ResultsOur algorithm correctly detected the number of clusters in a simulation analysis, outperforming the popular Mclust method. In an applied example considering the effect of blood pressure on coronary artery disease risk, the method detected four clusters of genetic variants. A hypothesis-free search suggested that variants in the cluster with a negative effect of blood pressure on coronary artery disease risk were more strongly related to trunk fat percentage and other adiposity measures than variants not in this cluster. Availability and ImplementationMR-Clust can be downloaded from https://github.com/cnfoley/mrclust. Contactsb452@medschl.cam.ac.uk or christopher.foley@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk Supplementary InformationSupplementary Material is included in the submission.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 88
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A robust and efficient method for Mendelian randomization with hundreds of genetic variants: unravelling mechanisms linking HDL-cholesterol and coronary heart disease
Stephen Burgess, Christopher N. Foley, … Joanna M. M. Howson·bioRxiv·Mar 4, 2019
- Bayesian Variable Selection with a Pleiotropic Loss Function in Mendelian Randomization
Apostolos Gkatzionis, Stephen Burgess, … Paul J. Newcombe·Statistics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jun 21, 2021
- Mendelian Randomization Analysis Using Mixture Models (MRMix) for Genetic Effect-Size-Distribution Leads to Robust Estimation of Causal Effects
Guanghao Qi, Nilanjan Chatterjee·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2019
- A Bayesian approach to Mendelian randomization using summary statistics in the univariable and multivariable settings with correlated pleiotropy
Andrew J. Grant, Stephen Burgess·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian Randomization
Hans van Kippersluis, Cornelius A Rietveld·International Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 22, 2017
- Improving on a modal-based estimation method: model averaging for consistent and efficient estimation in Mendelian randomization when a plurality of candidate instruments are valid
Stephen Burgess, Verena Zuber, … Christopher N. Foley·bioRxiv·Aug 11, 2017