Mendelian Randomization Analysis Using Mixture Models (MRMix) for Genetic Effect-Size-Distribution Leads to Robust Estimation of Causal Effects
Abstract
We propose a novel method for robust estimation of causal effects in two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis using potentially large number of genetic instruments. We consider a \"working model\" for bi-variate effect-size distribution across pairs of traits in the form of normal-mixtures which assumes existence of a fraction of the genetic markers that are valid instruments, i.e. they have only direct effect on one trait, while other markers can have potentially correlated, direct and indirect effects, or have no effects at all. We show that model motivates a simple method for estimating causal effect ({theta}) through a procedure for maximizing the probability concentration of the residuals, [Formula], at the \"null\" component of a two-component normal-mixture model. Simulation studies showed that MRMix provides nearly unbiased or/and substantially more robust estimates of causal effects compared to alternative methods under various scenarios. Further, the studies showed that MRMix is sensitive to direction and can achieve much higher efficiency (up to 3-4 fold) relative to other comparably robust estimators. We applied the proposed methods for conducting MR analysis using largest publicly available datasets across a number of risk-factors and health outcomes. Notable findings included identification of causal effects of genetically determined BMI and ageat-menarche, which have relationship among themselves, on the risk of breast cancer; detrimental effect of HDL on the risk of breast cancer; no causal effect of HDL and triglycerides on the risk of coronary artery disease; a strong detrimental effect of BMI, but no causal effect of years of education, on the risk of major depressive disorder.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 207
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian Randomization
Hans van Kippersluis, Cornelius A Rietveld·International Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 22, 2017
- Robust Mendelian randomization in the presence of residual population stratification, batch effects and horizontal pleiotropy
Carlos Cinelli, Nathan LaPierre, … Eleazar Eskin·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2022
- CaPri: Bayesian Mendelian randomization for joint estimation of causal and pleiotropic effects
Ou Ren, Wenmin Zhang, Tianyuan Lu·medRxiv·Oct 14, 2026
- A Bayesian approach to Mendelian randomization using summary statistics in the univariable and multivariable settings with correlated pleiotropy
Andrew J. Grant, Stephen Burgess·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Mendelian randomization analysis with pleiotropy-robust log-linear model for binary outcomes
Mintao Li, Tao Huang, Jinzhu Jia·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2023
- The use of two-sample methods for Mendelian randomization analyses on single large datasets
Cosetta Minelli, Fabiola Del Greco M, … John Russell Thompson·International Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 6, 2021