BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Super-delta2: An Enhanced Differential Expression Analysis Procedure for Multi-Group Comparisons of RNA-seq Data
Abstract
BackgroundWe developed super-delta2, a differential gene expression analysis pipeline designed for multi-group comparisons for RNA-seq data. It includes a customized one-way ANOVA F-test and a post-hoc test for pairwise group comparisons; both are designed to work with a multivariate normalization procedure to reduce technical noise. It also includes a trimming procedure with bias-correction to obtain robust and approximately unbiased summary statistics used in these tests. We demonstrated the asymptotic applicability of super-delta2 to log-transformed read counts in RNA-seq data by large sample theory based on Negative Binomial Poisson (NBP) distribution. ResultsWe compared super-delta2 with three commonly used RNA-seq data analysis methods: limma/voom, edgeR, and DESeq2 using both simulated and real datasets. In all three simulation settings, super-delta2 not only achieved the best overall statistical power, but also was the only method that controlled type I error at the nominal level. When applied to a breast cancer dataset to identify differential expression pattern associated with multiple pathologic stages, super-delta2 selected more enriched pathways than other methods, which are directly linked to the underlying biological condition (breast cancer). ConclusionsBy incorporating trimming and bias-correction in the normalization step, super-delta2 was able to achieve tight control of type I error. Because the hypothesis tests are based on asymptotic normal approximation of the NBP distribution, super-delta2 does not require computationally expensive iterative optimization procedures used by methods such as edgeR and DESeq2, which occasionally have convergence issues.
- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Field percentile
- 46th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- An evaluation of RNA-seq differential analysis methods
Dongmei Li, Martin Stuart Zand, … Zidian Xie·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2022
- A Comparison of Methods: Normalizing High-Throughput RNA Sequencing Data
Rahul Reddy·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2015
- Controlling False Positive Rates in Methods for Differential Gene Expression Analysis using RNA-Seq Data
David M Rocke, Luyao Ruan, … Sharon Aviran·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2015
- A large-sample crisis? Exaggerated false positives by popular differential expression methods
Yumei Li, Xinzhou Ge, … Jingyi Jessica Li·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 15, 2022
- Excess False Positive Rates in Methods for Differential Gene Expression Analysis using RNA-Seq Data
David M Rocke, Luyao Ruan, … Sharon Aviran·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2015
- SARTools: a DESeq2- and edgeR-based R pipeline for comprehensive differential analysis of RNA-Seq data
Hugo Varet, Jean-Yves Coppée, Marie-Agnès Dillies·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2015