Neural and cognitive correlates of performance in dynamic multi-modal settings
Chloe A. DziegoiD, Ina Bornkessel‐SchlesewskyiD, Sophie JanoiD, Alex ChatburniD, Matthias SchlesewskyiD, Maarten A. ImminkiD, Ruchi SinhaiD, Jessica L. IronsiD, Megan Schmitt, Steph Chen, Zachariah R. CrossiD
Abstract
The endeavour to understand human cognition has largely relied upon investigation of task-related brain activity. However, resting-state brain activity can also offer insights into individual information processing and performance capabilities. Previous research has identified electroencephalographic resting-state characteristics (most prominently: the individual alpha frequency; IAF) that predict cognitive function. However, it has largely overlooked a second component of electrophysiological signals: aperiodic 1/f activity. The current study examined how both oscillatory and aperiodic resting-state EEG measures, alongside traditional cognitive tests, can predict performance in a dynamic and complex, semi-naturalistic cognitive task. Participants resting-state EEG was recorded prior to engaging in a Target Motion Analysis (TMA) task in a simulated submarine control room environment (CRUSE), which required participants to integrate dynamically changing information over time. We demonstrated that the relationship between IAF and cognitive performance extends from simple cognitive tasks (e.g., digit span) to complex, dynamic measures of information processing. Further, our results showed that individual 1/f parameters (slope and intercept) differentially predicted performance across practice and testing sessions, whereby flatter slopes were associated with improved performance during learning, while higher intercepts were linked to better performance during testing. In addition to the EEG predictors, we demonstrate a link between cognitive skills most closely related to the TMA task (i.e., spatial imagery) and subsequent performance. Overall, the current study highlights (1) how resting-state metrics - both oscillatory and aperiodic - have the potential to index higher-order cognitive capacity, while (2) emphasising the importance of examining these electrophysiological components within more dynamic settings and over time.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Field percentile
- top 12%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Resting-state aperiodic neural dynamics predict individual differences in visuomotor performance and learning
Maarten A. Immink, Zachariah R. Cross, … Ina Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky·Human Movement SciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 15, 2021
- Task-related, intrinsic oscillatory and aperiodic neural activity predict performance in naturalistic team-based training scenarios
Zachariah R. Cross, Alex Chatburn, … Ina Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 28, 2022
- Alterations in rhythmic and non-rhythmic resting-state EEG activity and their link to cognition in older age
Elena Čėsnaitė, Tim Paul Steinfath, … Vadim V. Nikulin·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 29, 2022
- Multimodal Brain Signal Complexity Predicts Human Intelligence
Jonas Alexander Thiele, Aylin Richter, Kirsten Hilger·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jan 19, 2023
- Characterising time-on-task effects on oscillatory and aperiodic EEG components and their co-variation with visual task performance.
Martina Kopčanová, Gregor Thut, … Christian Keitel·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Aperiodic and oscillatory systems underpinning human domain-general cognition
Runhao Lu, Nadene Dermody, … Alexandra Woolgar·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2024