bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Leveraging a WGS compression and indexing format with dynamic graph references to call structural variants.
Adam C. EnglishiD, Nils McCarthy, Robert Flickenger, Surabhi MaheshwariiD, Lisa Meed, Alindrina Mangubat, Sri Niranjan Shekar
Abstract
We introduce a novel structural variant calling pipeline (BioGraph) that leverages a read compression and indexing format to discover alleles, assess their supporting coverage, and assign useful quality scores. To evaluate BioGraphs performance, we run five sequencing replicates of the individual HG002 through the BioGraph variant calling pipeline, as well as two other short-read sv-calling pipelines. BioGraph detects the GIAB benchmark SVs at a peak sensitivity of {approx}59% compared to {approx}42% sensitivity from the other pipelines. The overall precision of BioGraph is lower than other pipelines ({approx}81% and {approx}90%, respectively), however, adjusting for quality score, BioGraph calls were sensitive to a greater number of SV calls given the same false discovery rate compared to the other pipelines. Cumulatively {approx}77% of GIAB benchmark SVs are discovered by BioGraph in at least one replicate. After merging discovered calls and running BioGraph Coverage to create a squared-off project-level VCF, we find {approx}90% percent of discovered true positive alleles have at least 5x coverage in all replicates, thus increasing per-replicate recall of alleles having at least 1x coverage to {approx}76.9%.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 5
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- VISTA: An integrated framework for structural variant discovery
Varuni Sarwal, Seungmo Lee, … Serghei Mangul·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 25, 2024
- Fast and Accurate Genomic Analyses using Genome Graphs
Goran Rakocevic, Vladimir Semenyuk, … Deniz Kural·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 9, 2019
- NextSV: a meta-caller for structural variants from low-coverage long-read sequencing data
Fang Li, Jiang Yong Hu, … Kai Wang·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 23, 2018
- Genotyping structural variants in pangenome graphs using the vg toolkit
Glenn Hickey, David Heller, … Benedict Paten·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 12, 2020
- Sequence variation aware genome references and read mapping with the variation graph toolkit
Erik P. Garrison, Jouni Sirén, … Richard Michael Durbin·Nature BiotechnologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 20, 2018
- State-of-the-art structural variant calling: What went conceptually wrong and how to fix it?
Markus R. Schmidt, Arne Kutzner·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2021